1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leona [35]
3 years ago
13

Which one is it I’m not sure

History
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago
4 0
No the correct answer is the second one b cause president Kenny was assassinated by Lee Harvey and Oswald also jack killed Oswald two days later and the commission proven conterversial challenge and studies and so B will fit into that
You might be interested in
What method did the union use to stop most of the Souths cotton trade
galben [10]
Stop slavery i think
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Citizens are required to participate in juries if called upon primarily to ensure which of the following selections?
Dvinal [7]

The correct option to the question is option B: Juries have a random selection from the general population

Juries have a random selection from the general population and this is a very important point to take into consideration. A jury is a group of citizens assigned a court case who will participate in the trial and reach a verdict. They will decide whether the defendant is guilty or not from committing a crime.

It's important that the members of the jury are selected at random so that any partiality can be prevented. Before each potential member of a jury is assigned a case, they go through a<u> process of selection</u>. During this process the lawyers from each party will ask them questions in order to rule out any person who show signs of prejudice.

<u>The jury is expected to be impartial and only be influenced by true evidence presented in court.</u> Once the trial is over, the jury will have to reach a verdict, sometimes unanimously.

The amount of members of the jury may vary depending on the law covering the case, but it usually consists of around 12 members.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
The President Clinton policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" involved people in the senate, white house, military
nadya68 [22]
The President Clinton policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" involved people in the "Military," since this controversial position advocated for homosexual men and women in the military to not make their sexuality known. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think Roosevelt was a good wartime leader? Why or why not?
Morgarella [4.7K]
Yes, because he showed great leadership. He helped the US out during the Great Depression. He was confident, and turned out to be a great, powerful, and respected president.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • States are not permitted to have their own constitution is it true or false
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was an effect of early agriculture?
    6·1 answer
  • The British paid in ___________ for Chinese tea.<br> Gold<br> Pounds<br> Silver<br> Bullion
    11·1 answer
  • Which border state's loyalty to the Union was critical to keeping Washington, D.C. from being surrounded by the Confederacy?
    15·2 answers
  • Three million,six hundred five million,twenty thousand,nine hundred eight-two in standard from
    5·1 answer
  • What was the significance of george kennan's long telegram?
    5·1 answer
  • Florence Kelley believed in the importance of education for children and did not approve of child labor practices.
    11·1 answer
  • Am just curious who all goes to Henry d perry?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the "field test" for World war 2
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the crowning of Charlemagne by Pope Leo III significant?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!