1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KengaRu [80]
2 years ago
6

What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the

History
1 answer:
lina2011 [118]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

You might be interested in
In 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt formally recognized the Soviet Union. During the Cold War of the 1950s and 1960s, milit
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

Despite continuing commercial links between the United States and the Soviet Union throughout the 1920s, Wilson’s successors upheld his policy of nonrecognition. Roosevelt hoped that recognition of the Soviet Union would serve U.S. strategic interests by limiting Japanese expansionism in the Far East.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What area was taken from Germany afterWW1 and later was invaded by 22,000<br> Germans?
evablogger [386]

Answer:

Germany had lost territorial losses, including Alsace-Lorraine, Eupen and Malmedy, Northern Schleswig, Polish Corridor, Part of Upper Silesa, Danzig, Hultchin, Memel, and also loss control of coal-rich region, Saar, to the French for 15 years.

Explanation:

Germany had been so greedy with their things that people wanted to take the good things away from them to see how they would feel.

8 0
3 years ago
Question 30 (2 points)
lana [24]

Answer:

programs aimed at reducing poverty leves in the city

4 0
3 years ago
Why did some Americans boycott grapes in the 1960s
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

Americans boycotted grapes in the 1960s because the grape growers were unfair to workers. They were made to work long hours without breaks and little pay. As a result, Americans refused to buy grapes in order to help the grape workers union agitate for better working terms.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two members of the Allies shown on the graph suffered the two greatest numbers of deaths during World War I?
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

Russia and France

Explanation:

Bae, can I get that brainliest I worked so hard on this answer it's amazing

<em>PS, even though I'm very intelligent I still deserve brainliest.</em>

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • O
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Germany and the Central Powers lose WWI?
    12·2 answers
  • And 150 to 200 words explain how the American recovery and reinvestment act could create jobs
    6·1 answer
  • Separation from a main group to form a new group as a result of disunity is called __________. A)prejudice B)discrimination C)se
    9·2 answers
  • Why was Philadelphia important in colonial America?
    14·1 answer
  • After the battle of kadesh, where did egyptians control extend?
    11·1 answer
  • What are some similarities and differences about the features of maya, Aztec and Inca civilizations
    6·1 answer
  • What Christian idea does the excerpt state?
    5·1 answer
  • According to the Seventeenth Amendment, who could elect senators?<br>​
    10·2 answers
  • France vs Italy warm ​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!