The above question requires a personal answer, so I can't answer this question for you, but I'll show you how to answer it.
The first step in answering this question is to read "A Servant to Servants" and by reading it define your opinion about the text and the story it presents. To speed up this reading you can read articles and summaries of "A Servant to Servants," where you will have access to the most important facts and additional information.
After that, you should compare where your opinions and Lowell's opinions are similar and different.
With that, you can write your answer as follows:
- Make a light introduction to the text.
- Present your positions, that is, the opinions you developed when analyzing the work.
- Show how these opinions are similar to and different from Lowell's opinions.
- Seize evidence that confirms your opinions.
More information about "A Servant to Servants" at the link:
brainly.com/question/505321
Answer:
The blacks in America were deemed inferior and only seen as someone lesser, like a young boy among adults. Maybe, this is one reason why Wright uses the word "boy" in his title.
Explanation:
Richard Wright's memoir "Black Boy" presents the author's childhood and also growing up years as a black man in the American South. The book deals with themes of growing up, racism, family, and also a sense of trying to find his identity.
The use of the word "boy" in the title is ironic because Wright may be describing his childhood experiences but at the same time, the memoir covers well beyond his childhood years too. This may also have to do with his feeling of still being a kid despite being an adult.
Also important is how the blacks were perceived by the whites, the "superior" whites. Though same in all senses, blacks were hardly accepted by the whites as their own or equals, and more like inferior and lesser than them. This can also be one reason why Wright uses the word "boy", as a generalization of how his black people were perceived by the whites.
Which sentence uses an objective case pronoun as an indirect object?
I sent him an attachment that included photos of the picnic.
The indirect object him identifies to whom the action of the verb <u>sent</u> is performed.
<em>Wrong options:</em>
I e-mailed him yesterday.
(The direct object <em>him</em> is the receiver of action within this sentence: I emailed him).
He wrote back to Bob and I with an answer to our questions.
(I is not an objective case pronoun; it should be "He wrote back to Bob and <u>me</u>...")
So, once again, the answer is the 2nd sentence (I sent him an attachment that included photos of the picnic.)
Richards celebrate the end of the civil war by marching in the streets with a flag and a bell
according to him, every men in his neighborhood has a flag and a bell in their household. He wanted to follow mr. Noah and other leaading citizens to walk around and sounding the bell as hard as he can.
Well I'm not going to write the whole thing for you but I will give some ideas.
Explore how the fortune was acquired:
One of them may have created an invention that changed the world
Won the lottery
Won a competition
Saved the world
Robbed the London Bank
Whether the dynamic within the family changed:
They might all become robbers.
The parts might start argueing and cause a split in the family.
The parts might start arguing and they might go to a mini war within the family.
Hope I helped
(p.s please please please could I have Brainliest seeing as I wrote a lot there)
