Let's say you had a cake that is cut into 5 equal slices. Then someone eats 2 of those slices. They ate 2/5 of the cake.
Now let's say you have another cake that you cut into 10 equal slices. If someone eats 4 of those ten, then they have eaten 4/10 = 2/5 of the cake.
Check out the diagram below to see a visual of how 4/10 and 2/5 are equivalent fractions.
Going from 2/5 to 4/10 has us multiply top and bottom by 2.
-----------
Similarly, 1/2 = 5/10 after multiplying top and bottom by 10
The original expression 2/5 + 1/2 turns into 4/10 + 5/10
Then you add the numerators to get 4+5 = 9, placing that over the common denominator of 10
<h3>Answer: 9/10</h3>
Answer:
-0.924
Step-by-step explanation:
The magnitude of the correlation coefficient is the square root of the variation.
|r| = √0.854
|r| = 0.924
The sign of the correlation coefficient is the same as the slope of the line of best fit. In this case, it's negative.
r = -0.924
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's look at what we know. We know that...
P=2000
r=0.04 (Change 4% to a decimal)
t=7 (25 years minus 18 years equals 7)
n=1
Since we are compounding each year, we need to use this equation: 
Now just plug the numbers in: (Answer to #1:) 
This equals 2631.86
When we round, this equals to $2,632. (Answer to #2).