Answer:
In moderation, yes.
Explanation:
President FDR was surely a great president for what he did for Americans in the 1940s. Forcing Japanese internment camps are not one of his greatest contributions in our history living modernly, but back in the 40s it was not so frowned upon. If we, in modern days, looked back on this moment, we can see FDR was not so different than Hitler for forcing Japanese Americans out their homes and into camps. However, when we look back at the actions during WWII and we understand America's relationship with Japan and the unease it caused Americans, we may be able to sympathize with FDR and understand why he made that decision. He should be criticized for his actions, but those who criticize him should also understand why he made the decision he made.
*Hopefully this is what you're looking for. Good Luck!*
Answer:
<em><u>The</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>word </u></em><em><u>popular </u></em><em><u>makes </u></em><em><u>the </u></em><em><u>sentence</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>correct.</u></em>
Explanation:
<em><u>Because</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>if </u></em><em><u>the </u></em><em><u>shop</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>will </u></em><em><u>be </u></em><em><u>popular</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>than </u></em><em><u>it </u></em><em><u>will </u></em><em><u>always </u></em><em><u>have </u></em><em><u>a </u></em><em><u>long </u></em><em><u>line.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>And</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>if </u></em><em><u>the </u></em><em><u>shop</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> not</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>popular</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it </u></em><em><u>will </u></em><em><u>have </u></em><em><u>a </u></em><em><u>short</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>line </u></em>
<h3><em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> it</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u> you</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u> </u></em></h3>
<em><u>~</u></em><em><u>A</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>a</u></em>
Answer:
According to Thoreau, people who have the ability to serve the State without corrupting their conscience and maintain the ability to question government decisions as well as resist oppression caused by the government should be considered heroes.
Explanation:
Thoreau believed that heroes were essential for civil disobedience to be effective in the country. This was because for him it was necessary for citizens to be loyal to themselves and to be able to defend their concepts about what was right within society. For him, heroes totally fit that statement, because they were people who served the State, but remained true to their own beliefs.
This is because the heroes, even serving the State, were not corrupted by government benefits, but maintained their conscience and had the courage to question the State's decisions without fear of possible oppression.
Bittman's style tells me that he likes to cover every point and is very precise. He makes sure that everything is mentioned and also tells you the benefits and obstructions of the decisions the could be made.