Which of the following aspects of American government is NOT based on the philosophies of John Locke?

1 answer:

3 0

John Locke was not of the opinion that b) individuals must enter into a social contract with government.

John Locke came up with a Theory of Social Contract as well as other philosophies in relation to government. He believed that:

Government power needed to be separated into the legislative, judicial and executive branches for it to function well
Government power should be limited to certain roles
The government derived its powers from the willingness of the people to submit

He did not believe that people needed to get into a social contract with the government but rather that they should only do it consensually.

In conclusion, John Locke believed a social contract between government and people was necessary but that it needed to be done willingly.

Find out more at brainly.com/question/2152628.

You might be interested in

What happened in chapter 13 of Esperanza rising help plzz

Lelechka [254]

Answer: Both the first and last chapters take place during the grape season, showing that within one year, Esperanza's life has come full circle. Mama recovers and Abuelita finally escapes from Mexico, meaning that the Ortega family has completed the transition to their new life in the United States. brainliest?

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Briefly explain one way contents of the passages demonstrate roman society as patriarchal

mash [69]

They are made up of big groups

8 0

3 years ago

All of the following events happened after the terrorist attacks in America on September 11, 2001. Which of the following events

zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer: c

Explanation:c

7 0

4 years ago

What two assertions of Thomas Jefferson helped James Madison change his mind about the need for a Bill of

vfiekz [6]

Answer:

He stated that the people are entitled to a bill of rights against every government on earth and that just government should not refuse to issue the bill of rights.

5 0

2 years ago

What did Social Darwinists see as evils in society? How did they propose to fix those social evils

joja [24]

Answer:In modern America, Social Darwinism is not so much a belief system as something that other people are falsely accused of believing. It may very well be that some individuals are successful or impoverished because they have certain abilities or illnesses. But the notion of general superiority or inferiority is no longer something most people believe in.

Later hypotheses that were categorized as social Darwinism were generally described as such as a critique by their opponents; their proponents did not identify themselves by such a label.

Explanation:

i hope it helped if so pls brainliest <3

3 0

2 years ago