Answer:
180 are men.
Step-by-step explanation:
it makes the most sense
V=s/t
s=300 km = 300000 m
t=1 h and 30 min = 5400 sec
v=300/1,5= 200 km/h
or
v=300000/5400=55,5 m/s
If <em>c</em> > 0, then <em>f(x</em> - <em>c)</em> is a shift of <em>f(x)</em> by <em>c</em> units to the right, and <em>f(x</em> + <em>c)</em> is a shift by <em>c</em> units to the left.
If <em>d</em> > 0, then <em>f(x)</em> - <em>d</em> is a shift by <em>d</em> units downward, and <em>f(x)</em> + <em>d</em> is a shift by <em>d</em> units upward.
Let <em>g(x)</em> = <em>x</em>. Then <em>f(x)</em> = <em>g(x</em> + <em>a)</em> - <em>b</em> = (<em>x</em> + <em>a</em>) - <em>b</em>. So to get <em>g(x)</em>, we translate <em>f(x)</em> to the left by <em>a</em> units, and down by <em>b</em> units.
Note that we can also interpret the translation as
• a shift upward of <em>a</em> - <em>b</em> units, since
(<em>x</em> + <em>a</em>) - <em>b</em> = <em>x</em> + (<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>)
• a shift <em>b</em> units to the right and <em>a</em> units upward, since
(<em>x</em> + <em>a</em>) - <em>b</em> = <em>x</em> + (<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>) = <em>x</em> + (- <em>b</em> + <em>a</em>) = (<em>x</em> - <em>b</em>) + <em>a</em>.
The correct pair is option E, which is:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
<h3>What is the SAS Congruence Theorem?</h3>
The SAS theorems states that two triangles are congruent if they have two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent included angles.
<h3>What is the Reflexive Property?</h3>
The reflexive property of geometry states that an angle or line will always be congruent to itself.
In the two column-proof, since FH = FH using the reflexive property, then both triangles are congruent to each other by the SAS congruence theorem.
The missing pair of reasons that completes the proof are:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
Learn more about the SAS theorem on:
brainly.com/question/2102943
#SPJ1
Answer: what do you need help with
Explanation: you never posted a problem
