That could definitely be argued! The WWI was fought in Europe, so many European countries were left in pieces at its end. So they were definitely in need of outside support. One may also look at it from another point of view. The US refused to join the League of Nations, which shows that the country was not necessarily as involved in world affairs as it could have been.
Pierre de Coubertin is who this is, ask me anymore questions if needed.
Answer: Nationalism was never such a pronounced element in the war; the most perfect and deadly weapon was used.
Explanation:
Nationalism resulting from uneven colonization among European countries is a key factor that led to the war. Never before has nationalism led to such a great conflict as was the First World War case. Nationalism is a product of the 19th century and all its perniciousness during the war. World War I took more casualties than any war before. The use of new technological advances for military purposes has been devastating. Thus, in the First World War, weapons appeared that had never been used in the war before. Tanks, planes, flamethrowers are just some of the new weapons used by the armies.
Answer:
The most significant takeaway of this case is the legal precedent that it created for any future case that might use the recorded messages as evidence against a person.
People tried to escape the realities of the Great Depression by attending the movie theater and listening to the radio.
