Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
$845
Explanation:
Since he earns 65$ per lawn, all you have to do is multiply 65 by 13= 845
Answer:go to Google
Explanation they have all die why you care
Answer:
I request that you build more parks in neighborhoods for kids because they have no way of safely playing with there friends. It is very important that kids socialize because if not they will be shy and have no friends. Then kids will grow up have no friends and everybody will be lone which is bad because we want more active people.
Explanation:
cuse
Answer:
A) and also Juanita is needs some ✨therapy✨
