Answer:
Country of origin
Explanation:
This restriction is created by the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) , which is a law that created to ensure that people are not discriminated to obtain loans based on their gender, race, ethnicity or religion.
Asking information about country of origin can be interpreted as an effort to distinguish the consumers race & ethnicity. ECOA wanted to ensure that the decision made by the bank only based on the person's ability to repay the credit.
I do not know what you are asking soo here is the history of Oliver Hill:
Oliver Hill's sharp legal mind helped shred the segregation-era doctrine of “separate but equal.” He is best known for his role in Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark Supreme Court decision striking down segregated schools.Hill was a constant thorn in the side of hypocrisy, in the battle against segregation. His team of lawyers filed more civil rights suits in Virginia than the total filed in all other Southern states during the segregation era. At one point, the team had 75 cases pending. The Washington Post once estimated that Hill's team was responsible for winning more than $50 million in higher pay, new buses and better schools for black teachers and students. Threatening phone calls came to the Hill home so frequently in those days that Hill and his wife, Berensenia Walker, did not allow their son, Oliver Hill, Jr., to answer the telephone until he was a young man. Hatemongers burned a cross in the family's front yard. Hill persevered. Oliver W. Hill was born Oliver White in Richmond in 1907. His mother remarried and Hill took his stepfather's last name. The Hill family moved to Roanoke and then to Washington, D.C., where he graduated from Dunbar High School. Hill attended Howard University Law School with Thurgood Marshall, the The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) Legal Defense Fund's founder. They became fast friends. Extremely talented, bright and ambitious, they raced neck-and-neck toward excellence. When they graduated in 1933, Hill was second in the class to Marshall. Remaining good friends, Hill became a cooperating attorney with the Legal Defense Fund and joined Marshall in filing one of the five suits that won the Brown case, that ultimately dismantled legal segregation. Hill's early years as a lawyer were inauspicious. At one point he abandoned his practice and worked in Washington as a waiter. He later moved to Richmond, and began to practice there in 1939. He won his first civil rights case in 1940 in Norfolk. That decision ordered the school system to provide equal pay for black teachers. In April 1951, Hill and his partner, Spottswood W. Robinson III, received word that students at all-black R.R. Moton High School in Farmville had walked out of the leaky, poorly heated buildings that served as their school. Hill was one of the trial lawyers in the resulting desegregation lawsuit, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County which would be decided under Brown v. the Board of Education. Hill's involvement in his community went beyond the courtroom. In 1948, he won a seat on the Richmond City Council, becoming the first African American elected to the City Council since Reconstruction Days. After the Brown decision, Hill worked briefly for the Federal Housing Administration, first as Assistant to the Federal Housing Commissioner in 1961 and later, as Federal Housing Commissioner in the Department of Housing and Urban Development. After leaving his Federal Government post in 1966, Hill resumed his law practice in Richmond, Virginia as a partner in the law firm of Hill, Tucker and Marsh. Hill has served as an officer or member on the board of many national, state and local organizations, including the National Legal Committee of the NAACP, the National Bar Association, the Southern Conference for Human Welfare, the National Association for Intergroup Relations Officials, the Virginia State Bar Bench Bar Relations Committee and the Old Dominion Bar Association, which he co-founded. Hill's accomplishments as a civil rights advocate and litigator have earned him many awards and citations including the “Lawyer of the Year Award” from the National Bar Association in 1959, the “Simple Justice Award” from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in 1986, the American Bar Association “Justice Thurgood Marshall Award” in 1993 and the “Presidential Medal of Freedom” in 1999. Most recently, he received the American Bar Association Medal for 2000, the National Bar Association &lbquo;Hero of the Law” award in August 2000, and in September 2000, he and other LDF lawyers were honored with the ”Harvard Medal of Freedom“ for their role in the Brown v. Board of Education decision.
These changes reflect the fact that the parents of these two children are divorced and are undergoing adjustments on the custody of their children. This is often the most complicated part of filing for a divorce, because children are uprooted from their family backgrounds and are forced to live in a different situation from which they were accustomed to.
Answer:
scientific
Explanation:
A scientific method can be defined as a research method that typically involves the use of experimental and mathematical techniques which comprises of a series of steps such as systematic observation, measurement, and analysis to formulate, test and modify a hypothesis.
A hypothesis is considered to be tentative or an educated guess and can be defined as a testable explanation for an observation or a scientific problem. An example of a hypothesis is saying, Corona virus is caused by the introduction of the "5G" technology.
Thus, for any hypothesis to be true and acceptable in science, it must be supported by observations and the results of control experiments; this give rise to factual informations, theories and by extension solutions to problems. Consequently, we can deduce from the aforementioned paragraphs that a scientific method is simply an organized way to test scientific ideas and hypothesis.
Basically, the goals of science include the following;
I. Measurement and description of events or subjects that are being studied through research and experimentation.
II. Understanding and prediction of the natural and physical world by understanding the reason for each occurrence.
III. Application of scientific laws and control of mechanisms to proffer solutions to practical or real-life problems.
<em>In conclusion, the scientific approach assumes that events are governed by some lawful order by uncovering all of the laws or consistencies associated with them.</em>
Explanation:
Terrorist attack is the violence caused or people killed by militant group or terrorist group in order to break the national harmony. It is one f the most important global problem that needs to be tackled.
Some of the potential target site of any terrorist attack in California are --
- Amusement parks
- All telecommunications towers
- Sewage treatment plants
- Electrical power generation and also transmission facilities
- Energy grid
All of the above sites are declared as "critical infrastructure" in the Patriot Act of 2001 of the United States and any destruction to any of these structures may impact the national security and economy of the country.
