Adverbs are simply words that describe verbs (an action or a doing word). • He ate his breakfast in a hurry. The adverb 'quickly' describes how he ate (the verb) his breakfast.
Put your coats and hats here.
Adverbs are used in sentences to provide additional information about the verb or action. It also has the property of describing one or more adjectives.
An adverb is a word that is used to change, modify, or qualify several types of words, such as an adjective, a verb, a clause, another adverb, or any other type of word or phrase that, with the exception of determiners and adjectives that directly modify nouns, is used to change, modify, or qualify them. Adverbs are best understood by picturing them as the words that provide context.
To learn more on adverbs
brainly.com/question/1397001
#SPJ4
Infinite Jest tells us that we all fall into different kinds of addiction. It could be anything literal or figurative. One of these addictions could be addiction to ourselves. We tend to be addicted to ourselves. This narcissistic desires cause us to act according to it. And of course, there are consequences.
Answer:
The one way mirror is a mirror for one and a window for the other side.
Explanation:
In <em>Through the looking glass</em> by the Washington Post, the author uses the one way mirror to describe the peculiar relation between the US and Canada.
For most Americans, i.e. United States citizens, Canada is an empty screen, for we either don´t know much of it or we are not interested. Or a mixture of both. Therefore the Americans are on the mirror side. We look at ourselves and can only imagine what is behind the mirror.
For the Canadians the mirror is a window that clearly shows how much the other side has influenced (economically, culturally) them. Of course the worldpower factor is decisive in the one way mirror comparison: The US, as the worldpower, cannot be bothered by taking neighbouring countries all too serious; Canada, on the other side, is submitted to play the small little brother that follows suit with everything big brother does.
You wake up tomorrow and discover you are either blind or deaf.
Argument for losing sight -
You would have the memories of what things look liked, color and descriptions would make sense and you would be able to follow conversations easily. You could learn braille to read and have devices to read to you.
Argument against losing sight -
You would not really have any idea of what was in the room with you. Fear would probably be more common as you can't see the unknown. You would have to rely on others for many things. You would have to learn how to detect emotion through sound. You would never get to see anything new (art, movies, pictures etc). You will never see your children/grandchildren grow up, get married etc.
Argument for losing hearing -
You could see everything around you and you could learn lip reading etc. You know what things sound like so you as you are watching things, memories of sound will help follow along. Visual cues can tell you things that hearing can not tell you.
Argument against losing hearing -
You could not hear what was going on around you if you were not directly facing it. Communication with others may be hard since you will need line of sight to read lips. The silence will drive you crazy since you are not used to it. You would never hear your grand kids speak. You would never hear any new music.
