China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States
This is prob to late but its b
Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.
Explanation:
The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.
The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.
This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.
The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15650754#readmore
Answer: Genocide as a historical term is as old as civilization.
Explanation:
Throughout the history of humankind, we find many traces of crimes that allude to genocidal acts. However, genocide as a legal form emerged after the Second World War and the genocide of Jews. Its definition was given by the Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin. Yet genocide as a historical form is much older than the Holocaust of World War II. When we talk about the genocide in Rwanda, it happened during 1994. The capital of Rwanda (Kigali) was the site of one of the most horrific genocides in history.
However, crimes took place across the country. In less than a year, the multi-ethnic Hutu tribe killed about a million members of the Tutsi minority. They eliminated as many as 10,000 people a day. The root of this horrible genocidal action has its historical traces. Namely, Rwanda was a Belgian colony for a long time, a tribe of Tutsi, and if few, it was dominant for a long time. The reason lies in the fact that they are more educated. The Houthis shot down the presidential plane and blamed the Tutsis for it. That is how the genocide began. The United Nations and the world have done almost nothing to prevent the horrific crimes that have taken place across the country.
Answer:
many of the kings who led after him were very weak and not at all near the levels of power Asoka had. The partition of the Empire into two also added to the flame.
