Answer:
The answer is <u>"a. 8.13%".</u>
Explanation:
Given that;
d0 = $1.75
p0 = $40.00
g = 3.6% = 0.036
By using the formula;
Price of the stock = (Dividend this year)(1+g) ÷ (r - g)
By putting the values;
40 = (1.75)(1+0.036) ÷ (r - 0.036)
r - 0.036 = (1.75)(1.036) ÷ 40
r - 0.036 = 1.813 ÷ 40
r - 0.036 = 0.045325
r = 0.045325 + 0.036
r = 0.081325 = 0.081325 x 100
<u>r = 8.13%</u>
Answer:
c. 120,000 shares
Explanation:
*Assumed purchase of treasury shares
$600,000
//
Note: The proceeds also must be increased (or decreased) by any tax benefits that would be added to (or deducted from) paid-in capital when the eventual tax deduction differs from the amount expense, the "excess tax benefit." Since that occurs when the stock price at vesting differs from the stock price at the grant date, the fact that the market price remained at $10 avoided that issue.
Answer:
$52,860
Explanation:
The computation of the ending inventory using the lower of cost or market method is shown below:
Product Cost Net realizable value Lower of cost or NRV
RSK-89013 600 × $38 = $22,800 600 × $47 = $28,800 $22,800
LKW-91247 420 × $47 = $19,740 420 × $40 = $16,800 $16,800
QEC-57429 510 × $26 = $13,260 510 × $32 = $16,320 $13,260
Carrying value of the ending inventory is $52,860
Answer:
In his landmark essay on the nature of economics, Lionel Robbins defined economics as. “the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses”
Explanation:
Answer: Trade off analysis
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the decision making technique under which the decision maker gives up one thing for gaining the other.
In the given case, Global corp. were asking their consumers to prioritize the attributes they were expecting from the new product. The higher demanded attribute would have been added and the lower one will be neglected.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct answer is trade off.
