Answer:
Sinclair originally published the jungle to show the horrible conditions immigrants lived in to American citizens. It turned out to cause a uproar agaist the food industry after sinclair descibed the unsanitary ways the food everyday americans ate.
Explanation:
Please consider for the brainliest if this helped.
The answer is Evangelical Christianity or Evangelical Protestantism. It is a worldwide, transdenominational movement within Protestant Christianity which upholds the belief that the core of the gospel consists of the doctrine of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ's atonement. Evangelicals have faith in the significance of the conversion or the "born again" experience in getting salvation, in the authority of the Bible as God's revelation to humanity, and in thinning out the Christian message. The movement has had a long occurrence in the Anglosphere before spreading beyond it in the 20th and 21st centuries.
Answer:
Paul is employing the specificity principle.
Explanation:
Nya~ hope this helped :3
Answer:
Number 1 and 2 are correct. Number 3 is "yes". Number 4 is "yes". Number 5 is "no". Number 6 is "no". Number 7 is "yes". Number 8 is "no".
Explanation:
Number one isn't fair because the juvenile wouldn't know what to say and would be confused about what's happening or going to happen because they didn't have enough time to prepare. Number 2 isn't fair because she might say something that she didn't know she was/wasn't supposed to say that the lawyer would have told her. Number 3 is fair because they aren't supposed to lie in court and the judge needs to know what happened to know how much trouble the person gets and who gets it. Number 4 is fair because since the person is underage and doesn't have enough money to buy a lawyer, the court should assign one to the juvenile. Number 5 is no because the judge or the person going against the juvenile could say something that never happened or never been said at the hearing. Number 6 is no because there's nothing against the juvenile about what happened and he/she could be innocent. Number 7 is yes because the court needs all the evidence and proof about what happened so the judge knows what to do. Number 8 is no because the parents might not be able to make it because they might forget the date of the hearing and they need writing for when the date is and where the hearing is, incase they forgot. I really hope i helped.