Answer:Validity
Explanation:
Validity is measure of how valid the research is which means it gives solid relevant result which were initially intended. It is a test of how valid both your design and method of the research is.
There are various factors that can affect validity of the research.
There are internal factors that can affect validity of the research those are the ones that occur within the study such as failure to monitor vital variables of the study or using the inaccurate instrument to gather the needed data.
Below are the factors that has an impact on internal validity.
-size of the studied population
-instruments used
-history
-subject variability
-available time to gather data
- attrition
External validity are affected by the external factors such as the place where you conduct your research which may restrict the ability to obtain actual results . It can also be affected by the things like not being able to balance your subjects for example focusing on one gender and race eventhough your research is about all the types of people at large.
Crucial factors that affects external validity.
- The effect of time
- method use to collect data
- characteristics of the chosen population
- experiment effect
- interaction of subject selection
Answer: A
Explanation: The correct answer is letter A, psychodinamic.
In a psychodinamic approach, the client must confront their childhood traumas in order to solve them and have a more functioning way of life.
This theory relies on that unsolved childhood experiences determine the way we are going to express our disorders or how we are going to behave; For example, in a more Freudian approach fixations in different stages of sexual development can result into certain mental disorders.
1) B - Study of markets, resources, and productivity
2) A - Businesses *receive* or *purchase* goods and services in product markets.
The answer is rarely. Motions to suppress physical evidence are trailed in fewer than 5% of the cases, largely drug and weapons cases though serious motions to suppress identifications and confessions are filed in 2% and 4% of the cases. The success rate of motions to suppress is equally marginal. Successful motions to suppress physical evidence occur in only 0.69% of the cases, while successful motions to suppress identifications or confessions occur much less often. Furthermore, not all who successfully suppressed evidence runaway conviction in which particularly when only an identification or a confession was suppressed. In all, only 46 cases less than 0.6% of the cases studies were nowhere to be found because of the three exclusionary rules combined most of them linking offenses that would have suffered less than six months of imprisonment or first offenders. Finally, the influence of unsuccessful motions on succeeding plea negotiating was found to be marginal if only unsuccessful motions to eliminate confessions caused in any real sentencing concerns.
Answer:
B. The colonist lived under a tyrannical rule of the British so they decided to use an opposite model of government.
Explanation:
Under the Old British's system of government all the decisions in the country is centralized to a very small group of people (The King and his trusted advisers). This system make it really difficult for the people to resist the government when the decisions negatively impact the livelihood of the people.
Under the Articles of the Confederation, the Framers proposed that the new model of government should give the states with the power to regulate themselves without direct intervention from the Central government. By doing this, they hope that the central government wouldn't turned into a tyranny.
