Answer: Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.
Explanation:
The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.
Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.
Answer:
60 Kits
Explanation:
Cost price (C) = $20/Kit
Yearly se (D) = 250 kit/year
Shipping cost / Ordering cost (Co) = $25
Holding cost (Ch) = $3.5/Kit-year
Economic order quantity = √2.D.Co / Ch
Economic order quantity = √2*250*25/3.5
Economic order quantity = √12500/3.5
Economic order quantity = √3571.4285
Economic order quantity = 59.7614305
Economic order quantity = 60 Kits
Answer:
$3 trillion and $2 trillion, respectively
Explanation:
Private savings in (Income - Taxes) -Consumption
National/Public Savings are (taxes - expenditures)
Answer:
Bread sticks: 6 × $2.50 = $15
Pizza: $12.99
$15 + $12.99 = $27.99
Tax: 7% = 0.07
$27.99 × 0.07 = $1.96 (approximate)
$27.99 - $1.96 = $26.03
hope this helped you!
Answer:
A. How much time would it take the two students to complete the project if they divide the two tasks equally?
- James needs 10 hours to complete half the task and Jane needs 16 hours to do her part = total work 26 hours
B. How much time would it take the two students to complete the project if they use comparative advantage and specialize in calculating or preparing slides?
- If they specialize, then Jane should do the calculations (12 hours) and James should prepare the slides (10 hours) = total work 22 hours
C. If James and Jane have the same opportunity cost of $5 per hour, is there a better solution than for each to specialize in calculating or preparing slides?
- Yes, Jane should pay James so that he does the whole work all by himself. Since James opportunity cost is $5 per hour, his total economic cost of doing the work is $100, and half of that is $50. Jane's economic cost of doing her part is $60 (= 12 x $5), so if she pays any amount lower than $60 and equal or higher than $50 to James, then they would both win.
Explanation:
50 powerpoint slides
James needs 10 hours to do the calculations and 10 hours to prepare the slides = 20 hours total / 2 = 10 hours
Jane needs 12 hours to do the calculations and 20 hours to prepare the slides = 32 hours total / 2 = 16 hours
James's opportunity cost of doing the calculations or preparing the slides is 10 / 10 = 1
Jane's opportunity cost of doing one hour of calculations is 20 / 12 = 1.67 hours of preparing slides.
Jane's opportunity cost of doing one hour of preparing slides is 12 / 20 = 0.6 hours of calculations.
