Answer:
Optimal mix
Reno = 615 units
Tahoe = 0 units
Explanation:
Whenever a company is faced with a limiting factor i.e a resource in short supply, the company should allocate the resource to the product with he highest contribution per unit of the scare resource
Product Cont/unit painting hr /unit cont/hr Ranking
Reno $120 4 30 Ist
Tahoe $78 3 26 2nd
The company should use all of its limited 2,460 painting hours to produce the two products as follows:
Reno
= 2460/4
= 615 units of Reno
<em>This is so as long as Billings Company can produce and sell as many units of Reno as it can produce.</em>
Optimal mix
Reno = 615 units
Tahoe = 0 units
Answer:
Take a sec to recuperate and get yourself together and evaluate what you did wrong and try and laugh it off, I don't mean not to take it seriously but don't get down on yourself about it.
Explanation:
Answer:
C) category points-of-parity.
Explanation:
With category points-of-parity the emphasis is on Nivea brand offering the relevant category features. These are features a brand must have to be considered competitors in a particular industry.
So for deodorants people want to know if they are strong, will the shampoo clean effectively, and will cosmetics be colourful.
Without these key features in the products Nivea would lose competitive advantage.
Answer:
b) $1,160
Explanation:
From the above information,
I=Investment = 50
G=Government expenditure = 150
X=Net export = 20
a=autonomous consumption = 100
b=Marginal propensity to consume = 0.75
Y=Equilibrium GDP
C = consumption ;
C = 100 + 0.75Y (Y income - 40 taxes)
Planned aggregate expenditure (PAE)
PAE = C + l +G +X
Substituting for C in the above equation,
PAE = 100 + 0.75 (Y - 40) + 50 + 150+ 20
= 100 + 0.75Y -30 + 50 + 150 + 20
= 290 + 0.75Y
Since short run exists when Y = PAE
Therefore,
Y = 290 + 0.75Y
Collect like terms
Y - 0.75Y = 290
0.25Y =290
Y = 290/0.25
Y = 1,160
