1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
k0ka [10]
2 years ago
15

Why was abraham lincoln's emancipation proclamation important?

History
2 answers:
lyudmila [28]2 years ago
7 0

The reason why the emancipation proclamation was important was because: it freed all the enslaved people in the united states.

<h3>Whaty was President Lincoln's emancipation proclamation?</h3>

This was the insistence by President Lincoln that the American civil war was a war for the enslaved to have their freedom.

The civil war was because the South had disagreed to the freedom of the enslaved blacks in the country.

Read more on President Lincoln here: brainly.com/question/7955162

mamaluj [8]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It weakened the Confederacy by encouraging enslaved people to leave.

Explanation: I took the K-12 test! :D

You might be interested in
In 300 words or less describe how Oedipus's characterization relates to the plot
madreJ [45]

There is a very close relationship between plot and characterization or character development. As the plot moves forward, the plot reveals the characters' qualities. Likewise, it is also the characters' actions, beliefs, attitudes, and motivations, all of which make up characterization, that help to move the plot forward.One of Oedipus's qualities is his excessive prideand it is that quality which drives the plot forward the most. His excessive pride is...

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
From "Who was the most powerful woman in ancient history?" in newela<br> i need help with it
Reptile [31]

Answer:

is there a story connecting to this if there is could u send me a link

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
Which sttement best summarizes russia's experience on world war 1's eastern front
hram777 [196]

Answer:

The war in the east began with the Russian invasion of East Prussia on 17 August 1914 and the Austro-Hungarian province of Galicia. ... They made some progress, crossing the Carpathians in February and March 1915, but then the German relief helped the Austrians stop further Russian advances.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What does the American propaganda poster above reveal about the relationship between the
UNO [17]

Answer:

yes and yes yes yes1habhsvahavshwcz hVwsk

Explanation:

yes

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did americans consider cesar chavez a hero in the 60's and 70's
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the different ways Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt reacted to the "Bonus
    11·1 answer
  • As secretary of the treasury, what was alexander hamilton's main job?
    11·2 answers
  • What geographic feature allowed the roman empire to spread easily in this region ?
    11·1 answer
  • Wilson's Fourteen Points concerned a world peace settlement following World War II. true or false?
    11·1 answer
  • William Pitt the Elder thought that the British goverment________________-?
    10·1 answer
  • How would you reacted if you lived during world war
    11·1 answer
  • Write a persuasive essay in response to the Essental Question for module 4. Your essay should include facts and details about th
    9·1 answer
  • What is inscribed on the tablet held by the statue of liberty?
    10·1 answer
  • The main important of all agrochemical are_______​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!