The answer I agree with is C.
It is easy to differentiate if a book who deals with feminist issues was written by a man or a woman because a man could never offer the same insights as a woman.
Feminism fights to end the oppresion women have been suffering for centuries. It advocates for equality and dignity for women all over the world.
Since men did not underwent this discrimination, they could never understand women's point of view on the subject, and this would be very evident in their writting.
Answer:
A. To inform readers about the early stages of the war, the author uses a chronological structure to describe the outcome of each battle.
Explanation:
In the given passage, the author informs us about the battles that took place at the beginning of the French and Indian War and their outcomes. He does this in chronological order, which means that he tells us about them in the order they happened. This is why option A is the correct one.
Option B is incorrect because the author doesn't give us information about what each side was fighting for.
Options C and D are incorrect because the purpose of the given passage is not to persuade.
Answer:
America´s literary heritage
Explanation:
From the Colonial Period (17th century) and Early National Period to the Romantic Period (1830- 1870) to Realism and Naturalism (1870-1910) to the Modernist Period (1910-1945), they all contributed in some way or another to the Contemporary Period in literature, that reflected the social upheaval that acompanied the contemporary and all the other socio-political periods of America.
There is no such thing as a typical American writing style.
The core values (like the natural rights of people) do play a significant role but they don´t determine American literature.
America´s leadership or hegemony is a fact but it doesn´t make its literature consistent.
You're never going to make it home if it starts raining.
I believe the answer is C. Even though they can all be good.
