Answer:
Many American leaders in the 1870s and 1880s thought that Indians should be encouraged or even forced to assimilate. That means they wanted Indians to leave their tribes and ways of life, and instead adopt American ways of life.
(Assimilation means to blend into a different culture.)
Explanation:
<span>The key to your question is the fact that you asked if the U.S. government had "no involvement" in the 9-11 tragedy. Most people seem to jump to the polar opposite sides in this debate. Either you believe the government planned and committed the assault, or you think that everyone of that opinion is a crackpot and believe the government's explanations about what happened that day. I think the answer is somewhere in between. I find it difficult to believe that the U.S. government would plan an attack of that magnitude on its own people because there's far too much to lose. There's no doubt that there'd be a full-scale revolution by the people if the government was proven to be the masterminds of the event. In fact, you probably wouldn't even have to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. If enough evidence came out to make it look very likely, there'd be a very serious problem in the U.S.. Having said that, there are too many questions that have not been answered by the government - or the answers that they've provided are very weak and unbelievable. What makes matters worse is that the government has been attacking those who ask questions, linking all doubters to terrorist sympathizers. That kind of attack on free speech is dangerous and should never be trusted. I've always had a funny feeling that the 9-11 attacks are a combination of terrorist hatred for the U.S. and corruption by the Bush administration. I think that the terrorists hijacked planes and intended to hit the World Trade Center. I also believe that the government knew that the attack was coming, but did nothing about it. The attack gave the U.S. an excuse to expand its military and political activities in the middle east.</span>
Answer:
The 13th amendment abolished slavery, the fourteenth allowed people (men) of all ethnicities to vote, and carpetbaggers was the slur used towards former slaves
Explanation:
Klemens von Metternich was NOT directly involved with the unification of Italy.
In the Concert of Europe a series of alliances among European nations within the nineteenth century devised by aristocrat Klemens von Metternich to forestall the natural event of revolutions. Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, and Oesterreich united to satisfy sporadically to debate interests in maintaining peace.
Answer: Bill of Rights, Constitution of the United States, the secession of the Confederacy.
Explanation:
U.S. rights law represents elements that are partially involved in the United States constitution. In the period from 1777 to 1778, this law was proposed. In less than 12 months, parts of the law gradually became an integral part of the constitution. The law regulates fundamental freedoms and human rights and clearly defines the competencies of individual legislative bodies.
The Constitution of the United States is the largest legal and legislative activities of the state. Its origins date back to the end of the American Revolution of 1787, and it was created from that moment for the next two years.
In February 1861, seven southern slave-owning states declared independence from the United States. With this act, the American Civil War officially began.