1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marat540 [252]
2 years ago
12

Imagine that you are the leader of a country that has just emerged from a war. What priorities would you have for your country a

nd for the world?
History
1 answer:
Pachacha [2.7K]2 years ago
5 0

The major priorities I will implement if I was an leader of a country that just recovered from work is national infrastructure.

<h3>How to ensure nation building?</h3>

National building can be a herculean task after a war.

National orientation and integration would be a great way to start. Creation of humanitarian ministries to bring about cohesiveness.

Education and infrastructural development is also very important.

Learn more about nation building at brainly.com/question/1171548

You might be interested in
Should the Natives have been forced into assimilation, explain?
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

 Many American leaders in the 1870s and 1880s thought that Indians should be encouraged or even forced to assimilate.  That means they wanted Indians to leave their tribes and ways of life, and instead adopt American ways of life.  

  (Assimilation means to blend into a different culture.)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What happened with respect to the cold war with respect to 1987 the year?
siniylev [52]
<span>The key to your question is the fact that you asked if the U.S. government had "no involvement" in the 9-11 tragedy. Most people seem to jump to the polar opposite sides in this debate. Either you believe the government planned and committed the assault, or you think that everyone of that opinion is a crackpot and believe the government's explanations about what happened that day. I think the answer is somewhere in between. I find it difficult to believe that the U.S. government would plan an attack of that magnitude on its own people because there's far too much to lose. There's no doubt that there'd be a full-scale revolution by the people if the government was proven to be the masterminds of the event. In fact, you probably wouldn't even have to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. If enough evidence came out to make it look very likely, there'd be a very serious problem in the U.S.. Having said that, there are too many questions that have not been answered by the government - or the answers that they've provided are very weak and unbelievable. What makes matters worse is that the government has been attacking those who ask questions, linking all doubters to terrorist sympathizers. That kind of attack on free speech is dangerous and should never be trusted. I've always had a funny feeling that the 9-11 attacks are a combination of terrorist hatred for the U.S. and corruption by the Bush administration. I think that the terrorists hijacked planes and intended to hit the World Trade Center. I also believe that the government knew that the attack was coming, but did nothing about it. The attack gave the U.S. an excuse to expand its military and political activities in the middle east.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which Amendment to the United States Constitution officially abolished slavery? Which Amendment to the United States Constitutio
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

The 13th amendment abolished slavery, the fourteenth allowed people (men) of all ethnicities to vote, and carpetbaggers was the slur used towards former slaves

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which man was NOT directly involved with the unification of Italy?
Elenna [48]
Klemens von Metternich was NOT directly involved with the unification of Italy.

In the Concert of Europe a series of alliances among European nations within the nineteenth century devised by aristocrat Klemens von  Metternich to forestall the natural event of revolutions. Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, and Oesterreich united to satisfy sporadically to debate interests in maintaining peace.
6 0
2 years ago
What is the correct order from first to ast, bill of rights, united states constituion, articles f confederation declaration of
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer: Bill of Rights, Constitution of the United States, the secession of the Confederacy.

Explanation:

U.S. rights law represents elements that are partially involved in the United States constitution. In the period from 1777 to 1778, this law was proposed. In less than 12 months, parts of the law gradually became an integral part of the constitution. The law regulates fundamental freedoms and human rights and clearly defines the competencies of individual legislative bodies.

The Constitution of the United States is the largest legal and legislative activities of the state. Its origins date back to the end of the American Revolution of 1787, and it was created from that moment for the next two years.

In February 1861, seven southern slave-owning states declared independence from the United States. With this act, the American Civil War officially began.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ramses II presided over an era of prosperity in the new kingdom. Which most significantly reflected his prosperity?
    6·2 answers
  • Who was the owner of the New York Journal
    15·2 answers
  • Two ways in which religion shapes public opinion on domestic policy issues.
    14·1 answer
  • Who were they rebelling against in the Haitian Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • the ___ refers to the soviets strategy of sealing off Eastern European countries from western democracy's.
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the 15th century Europeans want to find a sea route to East Asia?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following things threaten our fresh water supply?
    15·2 answers
  • Describe the Columbian Exchange.
    5·1 answer
  • 7. What group did Ivan blame for the death of his wife and set about ruthlessly purging them from Russian society with the aid o
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the fur trade a significant cause of the French and Indian War?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!