Question

in general, a justice guided by judicial ____ would avoid going beyond the clear words of the constitution when interpreting the document's meaning. in contrast, a justice guided by the judicial _____ would be more willing to consider the broader societal applications of its decisions when deciding constitutional questions.

Answer 1

When a justice avoids interpreting the Constitution past its clear words, this is judicial restraint. But when a justice considers wider societal applications in decisions, this is judicial activism.

What are judicial activism and restraint?

Judicial activism refers to when a Judge/ Justice decides to consider the implications of their decisions when making court rulings. This can often lead to them making inferences on the Constitution.

This is the opposite of Judicial Restraint where a Judge/ Justice decides to interpret a law within the clear confines and words of the Constitution.

Find out more on Judicial Restraint at brainly.com/question/15452280.