Answer:
The Abington School District promoted religion in their school, by compelling learners to participate in a Bible reading program. The US Supreme Court's decision directly addressed case of Abington V. Schempp where students were being forced to participate in school-sponsored religious activities. The Supreme court held that the school was violating the establishment clause by just having this Bible reading program , even if it was voluntary.
Explanation:
During that time under the Pennsylvania law, public schools were required to start the day reading at least ten verses from the Holy Bible. The Bible verses were to be read without comment, everyday during opening of each public school. However the establishment clause, prevents the government facilities from establishing a religion.
Porfirio Diaz served as the president of Mexico for a long 31 years and is considered to be a good and functional president.
Explanation:
The presidency of Porfirio Diaz was long and often saw many long phases of difficulty but was usually marked by a lot of poultice support that in a sense allowed him to hold on to power for so long.
Positive effects:
His economic policies ushered a form of new industrialization in the country.
He was a stable ruler and he led the country through some difficult crisis and wars.
Negative effects:
The President did away with the system of democracy for a long time and ruled unaided and uncollected for a long time.
he deteriorated relations with US which hurt the country in the long run.
Answer:
C.Always follow the right path, even if it hurts another
Explanation:
right view, right resolve, right speech, right conduct, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right samadhi
Hope This Helps
Answer:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
Explanation:
There are some critiques to the Evolutionary Theories, among them: Biological Deterministic way of seeing the Hominideos and in many ways reductionist, to make it complex things simpler.
Analyzing the options then:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
These theories were not able to fulfill a model of predicting the future, leaving it blank for speculations. Also, it does not provide a cohesive and coherent basis model to predict the Post Homo Sapiens' future.
Despite those and other criticisms, this hasn't been enough to discard the Evolutionary Theories. On the other hand, the criticisms should be open for the sake of science.
