What can be logically concluded about each option:
- <u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
- <u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
- <u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
- <em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
If you are convicted of D.U.I. a second time in 5 years, your license may be revoked for up to 5 more years.
Answer:
i know th answer
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...............
The only sentence which is not a proposition is Sit down, because this is imperative, you are ordering somebody to do something, whereas propositions merely inform.
Is that french, spanish or greek cant tell...