Read the sentence. My dog Faideaux won the county dog show. What can be concluded about Faideaux? Faideaux is the speaker's only
dog. The speaker has more than one dog. Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show. Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.
What can be logically concluded about each option:
<u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
<u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
<u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
<em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
