1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixas84 [53]
2 years ago
9

PLEASE HELP :

History
1 answer:
AlekseyPX2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In the statements prior to the given statement, the author makes their opinion clear. The introductory sentence states, "How can a human being with any claim to a sense of moral responsibility deliberately let loose an instrument of destruction." Off of this statement alone, it is evident that the author strongly questions the morality and ethicalness of dropping a nuclear bomb. It goes on to state "This is not war: . . . this is pure nihilism."

Thus when the author states "strikes at the very basis of moral existence?" they strongly believe that dropping a nuclear bomb is immoral and unethical, they question the meaning of being human if "the very foundations or morality are overthrown" by dropping a nuclear bomb.

I hope this helps.

You might be interested in
In 1939, why did Great Britain remove their support of an Israeli homeland in Palestine?
Hunter-Best [27]
Probably <span>d.they wanted to protect their political and economic interests
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were Russian leaders unhappy with the Treaty of Versailles
krek1111 [17]
The creation of Poland took some of Russia's land, which Russia was unhappy with. The two countries went to war in 1920.
7 0
3 years ago
Which American objected to U.S. intervention in Cuba?
Kazeer [188]

It's A -  Andrew Carnegie

5 0
3 years ago
Why were so many Communist Party members against the NEP?
True [87]

Answer:

New Economic Policy (NEP), the economic policy of the government of the Soviet Union from 1921 to 1928, representing a temporary retreat from its previous policy of extreme centralization and doctrinaire socialismFlag of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1922–91.

READ MORE ON THIS TOPIC

Soviet Union: The NEP and the defeat of the Left

The last phase of Lenin’s life—first partial, then total disablement, then death—had fortuitously provided a sort of transitional period...

The policy of War Communism, in effect since 1918, had by 1921 brought the national economy to the point of total breakdown. The Kronshtadt Rebellion of March 1921 convinced the Communist Party and its leader, Vladimir Lenin, of the need to retreat from socialist policies in order to maintain the party’s hold on power. Accordingly, the 10th Party Congress in March 1921 introduced the measures of the New Economic Policy. These measures included the return of most agriculture, retail trade, and small-scale light industry to private ownership and management while the state retained control of heavy industry, transport, banking, and foreign trade. Money was reintroduced into the economy in 1922 (it had been abolished under War Communism). The peasantry were allowed to own and cultivate their own land, while paying taxes to the state. The New Economic Policy reintroduced a measure of stability to the economy and allowed the Soviet people to recover from years of war, civil war, and governmental mismanagement. The small businessmen and managers who flourished in this period became known as NEP men.

But the NEP was viewed by the Soviet government as merely a temporary expedient to allow the economy to recover while the Communists solidified their hold on power. By 1925 Nikolay Bukharin had become the foremost supporter of the NEP, while Leon Trotsky was opposed to it and Joseph Stalin was noncommittal. The NEP was dogged by the government’s chronic inability to procure enough grain supplies from the peasantry to feed its urban work force. In 1928–29 these grain shortages prompted Joseph Stalin, by then the country’s paramount leader, to forcibly eliminate the private ownership of farmland and to collectivize agriculture under the state’s control, thus ensuring the procurement of adequate food supplies for the cities in the future. This abrupt policy change, which was accompanied by the destruction of several million of the country’s most prosperous private farmers, marked the end of the NEP. It was followed by the reimposition of state control over all industry and commerce in the country by 1931

i hope the answer is helpful

please mark it as brainliest and rate it

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
01.06 The Historian's Clues<br> 30 POINTS!!<br> Please hep
atroni [7]

Answer:

Sorry I just needed some points. Have a nice day

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the allies react to the russian revolution?
    6·1 answer
  • The number 59 represents the average ___________ in 1900.
    8·2 answers
  • What is the name of the oldest mummy in chile?
    13·1 answer
  • During the Middle ages, Europe has lost its scholarship from which two ancient cultures
    12·1 answer
  • Think about what you just heard in Kennedy's speech.
    8·2 answers
  • What is scouts real name?
    6·1 answer
  • What effect did the glaciers have on ancient humans during the last ice age
    11·1 answer
  • In april of 2013 a major terrorist attack killed 3 people and injurd over 250 more when two bombs exploded at which american eve
    6·1 answer
  • HELP ME ASAP PLEASEEE
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the impact of your pumpkin once it was exchanged in the first 50 years or so.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!