Answer:
I think you have the answer right where the colon is placed. After instructions if that's not clear enough.
Explanation:
We can actually infer that the type of context described in this passage is: Historical context.
<h3>What is historical context?</h3>
Historical context actually refers to the information in a passage that tells about what is going on in the world when it was written.
Thus, we see here that the passage here gives a historical context.
Learn more about historical context on brainly.com/question/2456335
#SPJ1
Answer:
How to add a great answer?
Explanation:
ADD YOUR ANSWER
Answer and Explanation:
<u>What functions as a subject is not really the relative clause, but the relative pronoun - "that".</u> Relative pronouns can act as subjects or objects in the clause they introduce. Let's compare:
1. I am the only person who saw Erica.
2. I am the only person who Erica saw and recognized.
Notice that in sentence 1, "who" is the subject of the clause "saw Erica". However, in sentence 2, "who" is the object. The subject of the verb "saw" now is "Erica".
<u>The same happens in the clause "that was hurt before". The relative pronoun "that" - which is substituting the noun "ankle" - is the subject of the clause "was hurt before". Therefore, we can say its noun function is the subject.</u>
Answer:
Anaya structures his excerpt as an analysis, while Nye structures her excerpt as an observation