A hero can never achieve eternal life. This is the greatest lesson that Gilgamesh learns in his life.
2) Gilgamesh's quest for immortality ultimately fails and this shows the message that death is inevitable and a hero can not achieve eternal life.
<h3>The Theme of Immortality and Everlasting life</h3>
Immortality is an important theme in The Epic of Gilgamesh. While Gilgamesh is part God and part man, he is not immortal. He has some God like abilities but not their immortality. He is strong and fearless but the question of inevitability of death torments his mind.
To learn more about The Epic of Gilgamesh visit the link
brainly.com/question/935265
#SPJ4
The type of identity that is acceptable without containing a physical description of the holder is a driver's license.
<h3>What is an identity?</h3>
It should be noted that an identity simply means a document that can be used to identify and individual such as drivers license, birth certificate, etc.
In this case, the type of id that is acceptable without containing a physical description of the holder is a driver's license.
Learn more about identity on:
brainly.com/question/26045269
#SPJ1
Answer:
Most natural resources, including fossil fuels, are not distributed evenly around the Earth. Deposits of fossil fuels depend on the climate and organisms that lived in that region millions of years ago, and the geological processes that have since taken place.
Answer:
It pays wages to government employees
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
