Answer: $4.38
Explanation:
Conversion costs are based on completed units so those units that are yet to be completed will be converted into equivalent units.
Units produced = Units completed and transferred out + equivalent WIP
= 169,000 + (26,000 * 79%)
= 169,000 + 20,540
= 189,540 units
Total Conversion costs = beginning conversion costs + conversion costs added during period
= 103,000 + 726,925
= $829,925
Conversion cost per equivalent share
= 829,925/189,540
= 4.3786
= $4.38
Answer:
Decrease in Bank balance and increase in fixed assets
Explanation:
When a new depreciable asset is purchased, the money leaves the bank account hence reducing the bank balance in the statement of financial position, and on the other hand the 'Fixed asset' balance will rise by the same amount; recognizing the addition to the assets of the company. In this scenario the balance sheet totals remain unchanged as the same amount has been subtracted from 'bank' and added to 'fixed assets' all within the asset side.
However, if the asset is debt financed, it will increase the long term liability figure because 'bank loan' will be recognized. Hence the totals of the balance sheet will rise by the amount of the loan on the 'Capital and liabilities' side and the amount of the asset on the 'Asset' side.
Another impact is that the amount of depreciation charged to the Income Statement will be higher than $2,946,667 which was charged in the previous year because the new asset's depreciation will have to be added.
Answer:
net cash flow from creditors of $1.42 million
Explanation:
The movement in the long term debt account between 2008 and 2009 is as a result of the interest owed on the debt and the cash payment for the period.
Let the cash outflow to the creditor be H
$2.25 million + 0.33 million - H = $4 million
H = $2.25 million + 0.33 million - $4 million
H = ($1.42 million)
This means that the firm had a net cash flow from creditors of $1.42 million in 2019.
Answer:
<em>Most definitely, Tony would lose due to the integration clause.</em>
Explanation:
An integration clause <em>requires a short paragraph to be inserted into a written contract to confirm a final deal between two sides.</em>
Since drafting a written contract, it may fail to be fully checked by one of the parties involved to ensure that all provisions are included and that both parties sign the contract, which Tony failed to consider.
If this happens, one party could contend that the other failed to uphold a particular condition or phrase that they consented to verbally.
Im not completely sure bc i dont see anything other than letters so im gonna say B
