1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Whitepunk [10]
1 year ago
10

What about violence as

History
1 answer:
VladimirAG [237]1 year ago
5 0

Answer:

I believe that violence is not a solution to a social problem, because arguments in social life can start more problems for the people. Violence should only be used in a protecting manner to protect yourself or a loved one. nonviolent solutions can be extremely useful but in a protective situation to protect others it is okay to protect others using violence. because protecting yourself and family is a top priority, after attempting vocal problem solving.

You might be interested in
What 2 items common in Europe did the conquistadors introduce to the people of Mesoamerjca and South America
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Horses and Guns. Wish you luck and have fun!

6 0
2 years ago
What role did Spain, France, and the Netherlands play during the American
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

C. They helped the American colonies.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following led to end of the Neo-Sumerian Empire?
ololo11 [35]
Attack from outside forces
7 0
3 years ago
how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.

OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.

Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.

Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….

6 0
3 years ago
What two regions did Spain divide the lands
expeople1 [14]

Answer:

Treaty of Tordesillas. The 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas neatly divided the "New World" into land, resources, and people claimed by Spain and Portugal.

hope it helped :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was the Crittenden Compromise rejected by Lincoln and the Republicans when its aim was to prevent Southern secession?
    13·1 answer
  • Why might knowledge of the compass have allowed the chinese to have been, at one time, a major sea power?
    14·1 answer
  • Which region influenced Justinian’s legal ideas and which regions were influenced by them?
    13·1 answer
  • What were the main causes of World War 1? Check all that apply.
    7·1 answer
  • It involes mirror line
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains why mills, such as that established by Samuel Slater, were built along rivers?
    7·2 answers
  • What did Southerners fear would happen if blacks were given rights equal to those of whites?
    10·2 answers
  • "The Stench of hold.. was so intolerably loathsome, that it was dangerous
    7·2 answers
  • PLSS HELP WORTH 15 points!! Read this excerpt from Martin Luther's 95 Theses, theses 41-43, and choose the best summary:
    12·2 answers
  • Would you have fought with or against Charlemagne?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!