Well, this is not true, but the opposite is also not true.
<span>Structural linguists look for structure in language, so they would look at how words are composed of phonemes and morphemes. They are mostly working on current languages, but that's because they have access to them easily. When they can, they also study how those patterns evolved historically. De Saussure, the founder of Structural Linguistics is for example and important figure in historical linguistics.</span>
Answer:
PART A: How is the narrator affected when parts of the car turn white? He is embarrassed that the family will now be seen in an ugly car. He feels proud of how hard he and his brother worked on the car. He feels guilty for getting his siblings involved in his own plans.
Explanation:
PART A: How is the narrator affected when parts of the car turn white? He is embarrassed that the family will now be seen in an ugly car. He feels proud of how hard he and his brother worked on the car. He feels guilty for getting his siblings involved in his own plans.
it is not a matter of inference
the reason for Tan believing that "nonstandard English is no less valid than standard English" is related to the fact that Standard English’ was considered as a form of the English language, universal or common in the nineteenth century. By the 1930s, however, it was associated with social class and was seen by many as the language of the educated. On the contrary, speakers from lower classes in the past and today, tend to use nonstandard dialect features because they are more likely to have left education earlier, have non-professional jobs and have no need to associate themselves with a ‘prestige’ way of speaking.
Answer: She gets to be part of a “winning team” (if that makes sense) and also having the satisfaction of helping someone out. It’s why I joined Brainly :)
