1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleks [24]
2 years ago
12

Which statement is the most likely conclusion you can draw from the cause- and-effect relationship shown in the diagram? Cause E

ffect The British tax American colonists but don't give them any say in the British government. American colonists declare their independence from Great Britain. O A. The British treatment of American colonists inspired support for the British king. O B. The British treatment of the American colonists was one of the causes of the American Revolution. O C. The British treatment of American colonists had no effect on daily life in the colonies. O D. The British treatment of American colonists was one of the reasons the British got rid of their colonies in North America.​
B:The British treatment of the American colonists was one of the causes of the American Revolution.
History
1 answer:
neonofarm [45]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

i think its b

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What might you believe that incas designed things to last?
RSB [31]

Answer: Irrigation and terraces are still used today.

8 0
3 years ago
How were women affected by WWII? Do you think the war advanced the rights of women?
Alexandra [31]
<span>Women could now have jobs because of the huge demand for workers. Yes because it showed they could be independent.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a Private property
Reil [10]

Answer:

private property is a legal decision for the ownership of the property by non governmental legal entities.

7 0
3 years ago
(20 points :) ) Which claims about the declaration of the rights of man and the declaration of independence are true? (select al
solmaris [256]

The correct answers are: the declaration of independence speaks of a divine creator and the declaration of the rights of man speaks of a supreme being. Both documents drew on the "natural law" philosophy of John Locke.

Indeed, the Declaration of independence explicitly mentions the Creator in the preamble:

“"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen mentions the Supreme being in its preamble as well:

“In consequence whereof, the National Assembly recognises and declares, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following Rights of Man and of the Citizen.”

Finally, although both documents draw on the natural law philosophy of John Locke, the American version is more traditional in that it considers that such rights are given to humans by a deity or transcendent being of the same kind while the French version is more secular.

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Russians defeat both Hitler and Napoleon?
anygoal [31]
<span>How did the Russians defeat both Hitler and Napoleon?


</span>
<span>First off, they started pretty well. When the Germans first invaded, the people thought they were being liberated (tells you a lot about the government at the time) and were treated pretty well. But then they started killing people and things went downhill. Now, Hitler had this grand idea to take over Stalingrad (mostly for its namesake, Stalin). He thought it would be a massive blow to the Russian morale. But instead of basing his military strageties on logic, he did on feelings (he wanted to beat Stalin); which is never a good thing. Unforunately, he didn't anticipate Russian winter (which, luckily for the Russians, came early that year and ironically the same year for Napoleon). So the German army was stuck in Summer gear, rather then the proper Winter gear (which was promised but never came through). AND look at Russia as a whole: It's a huge country (I heard it takes around 8-10 days to just get through Russia straight across). Now, to the other guy above me. Russia isn't known for having the strongest armies ever. Actually, compared to the Germans they were undisclipined, untrained and from all types of backgrounds, and all ages, etc. Hardly sounds like an ideal army. But the Russian people were stubborn and burned everything, so in that way the German army failed. Plus, Russia had an endless supply of men. Hitler was shocked to notice, there was always a fresh supply of men waiting to fight.

So in conclusion, Russia's massive land(s) and brutal winters contributed to both the fails of Napoleon and Hitler's conquer of Russia. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the social concerns of the 1970s?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the period of hostility between Western powers and Communist powers
    9·1 answer
  • Help me please if you can
    13·1 answer
  • What part of the americas did the french first explore and settle ?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following locations was named by the French? A. the Cimarron River B. the Verdigris River C. the Wichita Mountains
    7·2 answers
  • Which country or region experienced the largest increase in total wheat acreage?
    15·1 answer
  • Which answer best represents Henry's argument against the Stamp Act?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Mirabeau B. Lamar easily win the presidency in 1838?
    10·2 answers
  • The first world war was ___________ because it could have been avoided ​
    10·1 answer
  • Who was assigned responsibilities under Athenian democracy?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!