1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yanalaym [24]
2 years ago
5

What statement was implied by the decision in Brown v. Board of Education?

History
1 answer:
Mrrafil [7]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: Separate but equal educational facilities for racial minorities is inherently unequal, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Explanation: In 1896, the supreme court ruled on the landmark case "Plessy v. Ferguson. This case arose when Louisiana enacted the Separate Car Act, which required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. Through this case, the supreme court decided that segregation did not in itself constitute unlawful discrimination.

The basis for this ruling was the "separate but equal principle," which asserts that racial segregation is constitutional as long as the separate facilities provided for blacks and whites are roughly equal.

In 1953 however, the Brown v. Board of Education case reached the supreme court as multiple cases regarding segregation of public schools converged. To promote civil rights through the U.S. judiciary, Supreme court Chief justice Earl Warren campaigned and achieved a unanimous ruling within the senate. In 1954, the Supreme Court held that “separate but equal” facilities are inherently unequal and violate the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reasoned that the segregation of public education based on race instilled a sense of inferiority that had a hugely detrimental effect on the education and personal growth of African American children. Warren based much of his opinion on information from social science studies rather than court precedent.

You might be interested in
Despite a 1938 supreme court ruling allowing their use, __________ were seldom used by management during labor-management disput
Nadya [2.5K]

The answer is Strikebreakers.

A strikebreaker is a person who works despite an ongoing strike. Strikebreakers are usually individuals who were not employed by the company before the trade union dispute, but rather hired after or during the strike to keep the organization running. Strikebreakers may also refer to workers (union members or not) who cross picket lines to work.

  • The use of strikebreakers is a worldwide phenomenon; however, many countries have passed laws outlawing their use in order to give more power to unionized workers. As of 2002, strikebreakers were used far more frequently in the United States than in other industrialized countries.
  • Japanese labor law significantly restricts the ability of both an employer and a union to engage in labor disputes. The law highly regulates labor relations to ensure labor peace and channel conflict into collective bargaining, mediation and arbitration. It bans the use of strikebreakers.
  • Canada has federal industrial relations laws that strongly regulate the use of strikebreakers. Although many Canadian labor unions today advocate for even stronger regulations, scholars point out that Canadian labor law has far greater protections for union members and the right to strike than American labor law, which has significantly influenced the development of labor relations in Canada. In Quebec, the use of strikebreakers is illegal, but companies may try to remain open with only managerial personnel.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court held in NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph  (1938) that an employer may not discriminate on the basis of union activity in reinstating employees at the end of a strike. The ruling effectively encourages employers to hire strikebreakers so that the union loses majority support in the workplace when the strike ends. The Mackay Court also held that employers enjoy the unrestricted right to permanently replace strikers with strikebreakers.

To learn more about strikebreakers visit:brainly.com/question/6845214

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
The problems of urban living in the late 1800s and explain their causes.
kap26 [50]
<span>Disease and pollution: improper sewage disposal, contaminated drinking water triggering epidemics of typhoid fever and cholera; fires; overcrowding; and jobs where the causes of urban living in the late 1800s</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Which statement about Valley Forge in the winter of 1777-1778 is most accurate?
faust18 [17]
D, is correct. If correct mark!

Have a great day! :)
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true of women during the 1920s?
kakasveta [241]

The answer is A. Women were able to vote starting on August 18, 1920

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which document announced formal separation of the colonies from England?
AnnZ [28]
The document that announced formal separation of the colonies from England was the Declaration of Independence. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did Germany feel about the Triple Entente?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the Viking everyday lifestyle
    7·2 answers
  • Need help!!!!!!<br> HELP FAST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Napoleon the third became emperor when?
    6·2 answers
  • Imagine that you overheard someone talking about the Treaty of Ghent ending the War of 1812 and they said "It's pretty much the
    12·1 answer
  • Have you ever heard of The Slit-Mouthed Woman? If you have, this isn't for you. If you haven't, read along.
    12·1 answer
  • The colonial era in Georgia’s history lasted until
    15·1 answer
  • What made inland travel and trade difficult in Greece?
    15·1 answer
  • In the middle colonies, what economic industry was used to turn raw cotton into cloth?
    9·1 answer
  • How has the rise and fall of communism affected the physical, cultural, and
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!