1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
3 years ago
6

In Bush v. Gore, what did George W. Bush asked the U.S. Supreme Court to do?

History
2 answers:
Nataliya [291]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In Bush v. Gore, George W. Bush asked the U.S. Supreme Court to end the votes' recount.

Explanation:

The Bush vs. Gore case was handled by the United States Supreme Court on 11 December 2000 and determined the outcome of the 2000 US presidential election. In three separate trial sessions, the judges decided with a majority of 7 to 2 that the recount of the cards that was taking place in some Florida counties had to be suspended due to a lack of coherent bases. In a further trial session it was established with a 5 to 4 majority that there was not enough time to establish the basis for a new recount that could have met the electoral terms in the State of Florida.

The court's decision stopped the recount of the votes and allowed Florida secretary of state Katherine Harris to validate George W. Bush's electoral victory in that state. The 25 votes of the great electors in Florida gave the Republican candidate the victory in the presidential elections.

The presidential elections took place on November 7, 2000. According to the US electoral system, each state conducts its own consultations for the choice of president and each candidate receives a different number of votes depending on the state in which he wins. Whoever obtains the majority of votes at the federal level is elected president of the United States of America. In 2000 the number of votes needed for the victory was 270.

On November 8, 2000, the electoral division report in Florida stated that Bush had a margin of victory of 1784 votes, equivalent to 0.5% difference. According to the Florida Statute, such a situation required an automatic recount of the votes. This process resulted in a restriction of the margin of victory for Bush and on 10 November, after the recount had ended in all the counties except one, this margin had been thinned until it reached 327 votes.

Florida electoral laws allow a candidate to request a manual recount of votes cast in a county, which Gore did for 4 cases in Florida: Volusia, Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade, which consented to the procedure. However, according to these laws, all the counties had to declare their results to the Florida secretary of state within seven days of the elections, and many of the counties that carried out the manual recount did not believe they could meet this deadline. On November 14, the day the deadline expired, the Florida court declared that this deadline was mandatory, but that the counties could amend their results at a later date.  

The dispute in the Bush vs. case Gore was brought before the court on December 11 by lawyers on both sides: for Bush by attorney Theodore B. Olson, from the District of Columbia and for Gore by David Boies. Given the importance of the case, the Supreme Court expressed its verdict only 16 hours after the hearings and the fate of the case was closely linked to the fate of the "Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board" case.

tatuchka [14]3 years ago
3 0

 

to end vote recounts

You might be interested in
Why would a historian consider the "maternalist reforms" an ironic or peculiar aspect of the Progressive Era?
andre [41]
Introduces gender bias while also fighting for the right to vote

Women were fighting for limited and restricted work hours for women and children. When child labor is ended it forces mothers to be responsible, at home, for their children. When women are restricted from the workplace, they are unable to make money for their family. These reforms were driven by middle class values and hurt lower class families and women. Also women were fighting for the right to vote, but reformers were taking away economic freedom for women. 
8 0
3 years ago
If you do not know dont answer and say i dont know just to get the points. i really need help.
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

When did the Salem witch trials take place?

February 1692 – May 1693

Where did the trials take place?

Salem, Massachusetts

who were the main individuals?

George Burroughs of Wells, John Proctor, George Jacobs, John Willard, Giles Corey and Martha his wife, Rebecca Nurse and Sarah Good, all of Salem aforesaid; Elizabeth Howe of Ipswich; Mary Easty, Sarah Wildes

What were the main events?

Salem Marshal Deputy Samuel Brabrook arrests four-year-old Dorcas Good. March 24, 1692: Corwin and Hathorne examine Rebecca Nurse. March 26, 1692: Hathorne and Corwin interrogate Dorcas. March 28, 1692: Elizabeth Proctor is accused of witchcraft.

When did the trails end?

May 1693

What were the effects?

Changes in the American Legal System

:} hope this helps!!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explaining Why does a natural disaster (drought, flood) in an agricultural region almost always result in higher prices for comm
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer and Explanation:

Natural disasters such as these can cause damages to agricultural products Any region experiencing frequent flooding and drought will have a reduction in productivity level. When this happens, the supply of agricultural products in the region will fall and demand will go up. Based on the law of demand and supply, this will result in the prices of commodities going up.

Drought and flood causes loss of livestock, storage problems, transportation issues and a fall in output. An increase in prices is used to cover up for some of these. An increase in input costs also causes price increase.

7 0
3 years ago
What was discovered on John Sutter's land in California? diamonds silver gold oil
Norma-Jean [14]

I think the answer is gold im not entirely sure

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you think would of happened if Theodosius had not divided the Roman Empire?
kvv77 [185]
If Theodosius had not divided the Roman Empire, I believe that the Roman Empire would not have been as corrupt and would have been stronger against it's enemies and it would stay alive longer. But, if he never did split the Roman Empire, then it would've kept growing to the point where it was too large and too hard to control, leading to Rome's fall.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would employers want there to be large numbers of unemployed workers around?
    11·1 answer
  • What did the populists believe
    11·2 answers
  • Paul had three ways to use his allowance money: spend, save, or donate. He decided to donate his money to charity. Any value giv
    13·2 answers
  • Which is the UN definition of genocide? Genocide is the attempt to wipe out an entire group of people based on ethnicity. Genoci
    12·2 answers
  • Read this paragraph. Ricardo dedicated his adult life to teaching the children of Five Pines Middle School. He taught Life Scien
    9·1 answer
  • Can there only be one vertical asymtote
    8·2 answers
  • How did the role of the church in education change over time?Which of the following was an effect of the Crusades? A. People bec
    15·1 answer
  • For each statement, select whether it is true of the Central Pacific Railroad, the Union Pacific Railroad, or both. It began in
    14·1 answer
  • The final step in this activity is to write an argumentative essay based on your outline that answers the question "Should the U
    15·1 answer
  • As a result of Germany's war crimes, the U.S. immediately recognized the establishment of what new Jewish state?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!