Answer:
Option D.
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope of a horizontal line is 0.
It is given that the function 1 is a horizontal line that passing through the y-axis at y = 4.
It means the rate of change of function 1 is 0.
The slope intercept form of a linear function is 1
where, m is slope and b is y-intercept.
The function 2 is 2
On comparing (1) and (2), we get
The rate of change of function 2 is 8.
The difference between rate of change is
The rate of change of function 2 is 8 more than the rate of change of function 1.
Therefore, the correct option is D.
I would say d. Hope that helps
Consider the contrapositive of the statement you want to prove.
The contrapositive of the logical statement
<em>p</em> ⇒ <em>q</em>
is
¬<em>q</em> ⇒ ¬<em>p</em>
In this case, the contrapositive claims that
"If there are no scalars <em>α</em> and <em>β</em> such that <em>c</em> = <em>α</em><em>a</em> + <em>β</em><em>b</em>, then <em>a₁b₂</em> - <em>a₂b₁</em> = 0."
The first equation is captured by a system of linear equations,

or in matrix form,

If this system has no solution, then the coefficient matrix on the right side must be singular and its determinant would be

and this is what we wanted to prove. QED
Rearrange to: x^2 + 18x - 25 = 0
Then factorise (I like to do it by completing the square):
(x + 9)^2 -81 -25 = 0
(x + 9)^2 = 106
x + 9 = sqrt(106)
The sol'ns are:
x = -9 + and - sqrt(106)