Answer:
Look it up and stop cheating!
Explanation:
They stayed strong and fought for what they believed in. They didn't back down when they were told that they would fail. They weren't afraid to lose their lives for freedom and love and they were willing to do anything to make sure their families were free and protected.
Answer:
tbh I think it's C.
Explanation:
A or B doesn't make much sense to me. The most important reason consumers would want free trade doesn't apply to D so what's left is C. Sorry if I'm wrong, just trying to help out.
When congress chooses to act exclusively in an area in which the states and the national government have concurrent powers, congress is said to have preempted the area.
<h3>What is referred to as concurrent powers?</h3>
This is the term that is sued to refer to the powers that exists in the government of the United States that is not left or reserved exclusively for the national government or the state government of the United States. An example is the power to tax.
Hence we can say that: When congress chooses to act exclusively in an area in which the states and the national government have concurrent powers, congress is said to have preempted the area.
Read more on concurrent powers here: brainly.com/question/847131
#SPJ1
Answer:Negative reinforcement
Explanation:
Negative reinforcement is based on operant conditioning theory. In negative reinforcement a positive behavior is enhanced by taking away a negative outcome or eliminating an aversive stimulus.
Aversive stimuli is everything that brings someone physcally or psychologically discomfort.
Negative reinforcement then means someone is able to avoid aversive stimuli prior to its occurrence. It is like taking prevention rather cure so you eliminate what ever can bring you a negative outcome before the negative outcome occurs.