<h2>Question:</h2>
What is custody and access
<h2>Answer:</h2><h3>
<u>Custody</u></h3>
- <u>It's</u><u> </u><u>care</u><u> </u><u>when</u><u> </u><u>someone</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>your</u><u> </u><u>custody</u><u>.</u><u> </u>
- <u>It's</u><u> not just that they reside with you, it is that you are responsible for taking good care of them. If you are arrested, you will be taken into police </u><u>custody</u><u>.</u><u> </u>
<h3><u>Access</u><u> </u></h3>
- <u>It's</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> ability, right, or permission to </u><u>approach</u><u> </u><u>or</u><u> </u><u>entering</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>place</u><u>.</u><u> </u>
<h2><u>#CARRYONLEARNING</u><u> </u></h2><h2><u>#STUDYWELL</u><u> </u></h2>
Answer:
Explanation:
The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.
Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.
Answer:
because of co vid and do nald tru mp doing things and people rioting, and the police found new tech and etc to increase their catch rate
Explanation:
the answer is Eulb. that is blue spelled backwards
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
please mark this answer as brainliest