Answer:
Protection against unwanted search and seizure
Explanation:
Freedom of religion wasn't violated because the FBI aren't trying to prevent him from practicing his religion.
Freedom of assembly is wrong because the FBI isn't preventing them from getting each other.
Protection against unlawful accusations is also incorrect because their is no unlawful accusation in intercepting suspicious messages.
This obviously leaves protection against unwarranted searches and seizures because the FBI took Tristians phone without gaining a warrant from a judge that would legally allow them to take it.
Answer:
unauthorized access to computers and networks.
Explanation:
https://www.wired.com/2014/11/hacker-lexicon-computer-fraud-abuse-act/
Yes, The evidence discovered upon first entering the house may be utilized in court to prove his guilt.
<h3>Which or which kind of evidence are not allowed in court?</h3>
Anything that violates the law or the rules of the court is not admissible evidence. For instance, hearsay evidence or evidence collected illegally is not admissible. Additionally, it might not be accepted if information is not directly related to the dispute. Evidence that is detrimental may also render it inadmissible in court.
<h3>What two conditions must be met before a piece of evidence can be used in court?</h3>
Criminal cases (a) (1) The defendant may demonstrate that the moral quality at issue in the alleged conduct is consistent with his or her decent moral character. (2) The prosecution may not establish the defendant's bad moral character as it relates to the moral characteristic at issue in the alleged offense, unless in rebuttal.
To know more about admissible evidence, visit:
brainly.com/question/29550883
#SPJ4
Answer: D
Explanation:
Im not sure but i think thats the answer
Answer:
12 because it shows 1 2 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 555 f d fdfd f dfd fsjfauhshashdal sdad asda duah da da .ad asdauhdu dau da da diuaduahd has
