The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Can legislative compromises solve moral issues?
It is an interesting question that cannot be answered with a simple "yes" or "no." That is the nature of moral and ethical issues.
Legislative compromises serve to dictate laws that must be enforced. But you cannot enforce a moral issue. That is why it is moral.
Legislators must serve the citizens who voted for them. Not to the interests of political action committees (PACs) or private interests of corporations. Legislators serve the American people, not to a lobbyist that negotiates on the personal agendas of the people who are rich.
That is the moral issue. The way a legislator is going to act when facing the pressure of particular political agendas that are the opposite of the interests of the US citizens.
April 8, 1864 was the date!
Democrats agreed too, winning the vote.
PLZ MARK BRAINLIEST!
Answer: the United States and the Soviet Union
Explanation: They were allies during the war. Together, they brought the downfall of Nazi Germany. When the war ended in 1945, these two countries emerged as world super powers.
Answer: proposed a bicameral legislature,
determined the representation in the legislature based on state population.
Explanation: The Virginia plan proposed the establishment of a bicameral legislature. It I also proposed the representation of states based on their population and numbers. The Virginia plan also advocated for the establishment of 3 tiers or branches of government namely: executive arm of government, legislative atm of government and judiciary arm of government. These arms of government were formed to create a system of check and balances for those working with the government.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
an opulent ceremonial feast at which possessions are given away or destroyed to display wealth or enhance prestige.