How did the foreign policy doctrines of the two Bush Presidents differ? ~One relied on multilateralism and the other was too ide
alistic. ~One required the promotion of democracy, while the other specifically prevented it. ~One was almost exclusively focused on building free markets, while the other was all about protection. ~One incorporated multilateralism and ignored alliances; the other focused solely on building a strong defense. ~One relied on multilateralism and the other was unilateral almost to a fault.
"<span>~One relied on multilateralism and the other was unilateral almost to a fault" would be best the best answer since the second Bush went into Iraq with almost no international approval. </span>
Answer:Mesopotamia was known as the land between two rivers, the Tigris to the north and the Euphrates to the south. Rains were seasonal in this area, which meant that the land flooded in the winter and spring and water was scarce at other times.
Im not completely sure but I think its B: great forests in North Africa were destroyed. My reason for this decision is that they probably destroyed the great forests for agriculturable land.
Some of them such as Rhode Island and <span>Connecticut were found for those who weren't puritans and didn't want to be ruled by Puritans who were very rigid. Maryland was formed for Catholic people who wanted to freely be Catholic. Some were even formed by people like Mormons who wanted to escape prosecution.</span>
