Answer:
1. The Federalist believed that there is no need for inclusion of Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that Constitution restricted the government not the individuals or citizens.
2. The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people
Explanation:
1. The Federalists believed that there is no need for inclusion of the Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that the Constitution restricted the government, not the individuals or citizens. - The Federalists which was spearheaded by the likes of Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, wrote various documents termed as "Federalist papers" (sometimes referred to as Publius) where they argued their case against the Bill of Rights. Their conclusion was that the Bill of Rights would only impede the rights of the people rather than safeguard them.
2. The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of the Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people - These group of people argued their case in various papers termed as Brutus, Centinel etc. One of the major personality in this camp is Patrick Henry.
Their submissions amongst others, were that the new constitution can turn the central government to be a threat to their individual liberties.
<span>Interpretation of data based on one's own perspective can lead to preconceived ideas, which means that you might create an opinion or have an idea that is not based on sufficient evidence.</span>
Overall, scientific rationalism harmed European religion because educated European people began to question the beliefs of the Catholic Church rather than just accepting centuries-old ideals, undermining certain fundamental beliefs of the Church and slightly decreasing its reputation. In terms of politics, scientific rationalism began the inquiry into individual thought, causing many governmental policies to be seen as flawed and, later on, sparking revolutions.
A citizen becomes involved in policy making by participating in elections. This is because policies will mostly be determined by the elected officials hence the need to ensure that one votes for representatives sharing similar views. This can also be achieved through participation in council meetings
