I believe the answer is:
for there's a swallow; Come one swallow, his mate will follow
Internal rhymes refers to a type of rhyme that occurs between other phrases across the lines (whcih is why it is often referred to as middle rhymes) . The word 'swallow' is rhymed with follow,and it's located between two lines with similar sounding 'llow' at the end.
Answer:
Biological perspective.
Explanation:
Biological psychologists area of interested is the measure of biological, genetic or phsysiological variables to try and relate them to psychological or behavioural variables. In the example, a group of psychologists are studying how certain parts of the brain allow people to distinguish between positive and negative emotions. They are studying a biological and phsysiological variable to relate it to a psychological one, an emotion.
Answer:
Panfilo de Narváez encourage Cabeza de Vaca to explore the Texas.
Explanation:
Cabeza de Vaca start his career by joining military. In 1527, Panfilo de Narváez appointed him as second in command. Cabeza de Vaca had given the goal to explore the new land, find out the gold reserves in these new lands and also settle in these areas. In the way of his journey, he explore Texas but his journey was a disaster because the local people of these new lands attack on them and some other incidents which causes severe damage to crew.
Watts says he believes that the autocracy that occurred and dominated Rome, can occur today.
He claims that this autocracy was due to growing social inequality and the inability of the Rome government to remedy the problems arising from it. This resulted in a strong wave of violence that completely left the control of the government and made people start to believe that all this disorder was created because of all the freedoms that democracy allows.
Watts says that for years we can see these same problems occurring in the US and other parts of the world, which justifies the support of many citizens for authoritarian and abusive governments, just like what happened in Rome
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), is a United StatesSupreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. ... The Minor v. Happersett ruling<span> was based on an interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. I believe the answer is A.</span>
