Answer:
7.5 m 457.5
Step-by-step explanation:
First, visualize the original cone and the smaller cone as overlapping similar triangles. The scale factor of the original cone to the smaller cone is 50:40, so if the smaller cone has a radius of 6 m, then the radius of the original cone would be 7.5 m.
The volume of the frustum is the volume of the original cone minus the volume of the smaller cone. The formula for the volume of a cone is V = .
Original Cone = = = 937.5
Smaller Cone = = = 480
Frustum = 937.5 - 480 = 457.5
Answer:
35
Step-by-step explanation:
49*5/7
=35
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
To obtain f(g(x)) substitute x = g(x) into f(x), that is
f(10 - 5x)
= (10 - 5x)² + 5 ← expand (10 - 5x)²
= 100 - 50x - 50x + 25x² + 5 ← collect like terms
= 25x² - 100x + 105 → D
Answer:
a
The estimate is
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is
The number of faulty breaks of method A is
The number of microchips broken in method B is
The number of faulty breaks of method A is
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is
The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is
For this estimation the standard error is
substituting values
The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is
The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
substituting values
The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is
The radius is half the diameter of the circle. If the radius gets larger then the whole circle grows. When the circle gets larger, the area gets larger too.