Answer:
Explanation:
Herbert Hoover was under the impression that the stock market crash of 1929 was a simple market correction, that it would go away if everybody just acted like everything was normal, and that markets simply do these things from time to time. Billboards circa 1930 with the blurb "Wasn't the depression terrible?" kind of summed up his tone-deaf approach to massive unemployment and runs on banks. He honestly believed that government intervention was not the answer.
By the time Roosevelt took office in 1933, he understood that no quick solutions were to be had. He did start a lot of public works projects, like the Works Projects Administration (which gave a lot of people short-term employment teaching, painting post office murals, and cleaning up public lands) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (which put a lot of broke farmers to work putting a utilities infrastructure in place in parts of the South, putting the pieces of a post-agricultural economy in place).
He also instituted several "bank holidays" to discourage panic-driven depositors from taking all their money out of their banks. Austerity became the new normal in America and stayed that way until the US entered World War II.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
they were all famous artists
Ludwig van Beethoven died on March 26, 1827.
Explanation:
Beethoven was one of the finest and most important composers of all time. He made incredible music despite being deaf and was the most respected composer by the time he died a prosperous and well known artist although he did have financial difficulties.
He died of Cirrhosis of the liver in March 26, 1827 in his own home in poverty after a few days of the performance of one of his last symphonies where he was going off time and it could be seen he was ill.
Answer: Reliance on legal precedent
Explanation:
Reliance on legal precedent should be a key factor in court's ruling since if stakeholders cant's success on mediating their reliance on precedent forfeit, then any claim they'do therefore, it'll be taken under stare decisis doctrine. This comes from a judicial theory that states: when a pronouncement has built enough reliance, then a presumption against adjudicative change must follow.
