1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svetlana [45]
3 years ago
13

how did thomas jefferson,abraham lincoln, and theodre roosevelt each increase the power and role of the president

History
1 answer:
Novay_Z [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Thomas

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What’s a country and it’s purpose?
WITCHER [35]

An indefinite usually extended expanse of land : region miles of open country. 2a : the land of a person's birth, residence, or citizenship left their country for America. b : a political state or nation or its territory the country of Italy.

Explanation:

I dont know if im correct

so sorry if im wrong..

Advance Merry christmas!

5 0
3 years ago
Which describes Haiti's leadership in the 1850s?
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

Under imperial rule

Explanation:

In this question, we are to select which of the options best describe the leadership style in Haiti in the 1950s

The correct answer here is that Haiti was under imperial rule

When we talk of the 1850s, we mean a period in the 19th century that spanned 1850-1859

During this period, Haiti was an empire.

An empire is like a king-ruled entity but the king here takes the title of an emperor and as such the style of leadership is an imperial one as the emperor would be referred to as the imperial majesty.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how can we interpret and compare speeches from president lincoln and Obama, and from Frederick Douglass, to help us analyze the
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

I have a short article included to help.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative continues to be a popular pedagogical text for high school and college curricula for the didactic reason that Douglass is a strong advocate for the benefits of reading and writing. Responding to the rumor that he might have been a well-educated freeman masquerading as a runaway slave, the educational elements of Douglass’s autobiography were partially intended to explain the source of his eloquence—tracing his beginning lessons in penmanship with neighborhood boys in Baltimore to his clandestine reading of The Columbian Orator. By including the letter he forged in his first escape attempt, he implies the message that literacy set him free. Setting a precedent for many African American literary figures who came after him, including Ralph Ellison’s fictionalized Invisible Man and the real-life President Barack Obama, Douglass fashioned a compelling explanation of his coming-to-voice, which even competes with, and eventually eclipses, the drama of his escape in the book’s final chapters.

One of the most dramatic emblems of Douglass’s literary education is the moment he becomes moved to address the ships on the Chesapeake Bay—it is a picture in words of his oratorical birth. In William Lloyd Garrison’s preface to Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative, he celebrates the theatrical scene: Reduced to total abjection by the brutality of his slavemaster Covey, Douglass retreats to the Chesapeake shore on Sunday, and gives a moving speech to the white-sailed ships on the horizon. Performing as if he were on stage, Douglass laments his misery, questions whether there is a God, and concludes that since Covey is probably going to kill him anyway, he might as well try to escape. According to Garrison, Douglass’s oratorical tableau is the visual and literary epitome of the basic human desire for freedom—a “whole Alexandrine library of thought, feeling, and sentiment” (7). Like Garrison’s investment in The Liberator’s 1850 masthead, adapting Josiah Wedgwood’s image of a shackled and kneeling slave asking, “Am I not a man and a brother?,” Garrison points Douglass’s readers to this moving portrait of suffering with the hope that they, too, will vicariously experience the slave’s resolution for freedom.1 Although Garrison seems to have hoped that the scene would principally inspire sympathy for Douglass among his white readers, in Douglass’s hands it also turns into a representation of literary agency with lasting significance for African American literature. Douglass’s figure of himself—embodied in words—as communicating with the nation is echoed in similar moments of coming-to-voice in African American literary figures to the present day, and has become one of the most enduring elements of his rhetorical legacy.

Douglass’s waterside speech is a curiously artistic milestone in antislavery testimony even beyond its anguished desperation. Garrison might have pointed to many other dramatic passages—such as the whipping of Aunt Hester, the slave auction, the abandonment of Douglass’s grandmother, or even the fight with Covey—but he chose instead to highlight this highly literary, if not overwrought, transformational moment in Douglass’s consciousness. In his essay on the aesthetic elements of Douglass’s Narrative, written over forty years ago, Albert Stone argued this speech was an expression of Douglass’s artistic impulses to imaginatively synthesize his thought processes concerning freedom (72).2 But put more bluntly, he might have admitted that Douglass probably never gave this speech at all. Part of what makes Douglass’s first autobiography so effective is his ability to blend his largely factual account of slavery so seamlessly with the inventions of art. Like his deliberately falsified account of his grandmother’s abandonment and death, whose purple passages remained in his autobiographies even after he admitted that they were not true, Douglass’s speech is one of the more glaring examples of his departure from conventional fact in telling his story

6 0
3 years ago
Why is slavery bad??
g100num [7]

Answer:

Slavery is bad because it goes against human rights, and inhumanizes people. I know that is pretty broad, but that is the gist of it.

I hope this helps :)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Essay on wealth of America
Vlad [161]
I would talk about Rockefeller for sure.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The White House Following are the Citations given today by the President to Dr. Jonas E. Salk and the National Foundation for In
    12·2 answers
  • Do you think congress is still the branch of the federal government that is most directly responsible to the people
    5·1 answer
  • Criticisms of conformity and materialism in American society in the 1950s resulted in which of these?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the result of the treaty of Ghent
    15·2 answers
  • Sara was always tasked with selecting birthday presents for her
    7·1 answer
  • How is the Democratic Party similar in beliefs to the Federalists? Both strongly opposed slavery. Both were formed because of a
    13·2 answers
  • What is one major effect of the three fifths compromise?
    7·1 answer
  • In the late 19th and early 20th century, a new economic and social divide grew between the majority of Texans and the very wealt
    11·1 answer
  • When did George Washington die?
    6·1 answer
  • Part of North Dakota once belonged to Great Britain true or false ?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!