Media coverage gives voters an impression of the candidates.
Because much of media coverage comes in very brief news segments and even short "sound bites," it tends to provide an impression of the candidates, without necessarily providing in-depth presentation and analysis of their views. This varies, of course, depending on which "media" you have in mind with the question. Committed news organizations which employ highly skilled journalists will do deeper pieces on candidates and their views or policies -- see, for instance, articles in The New York Times or Washington Post or The Atlantic.
There are many new forms of media--such as social media websites and politically-aligned cable networks--where people can go to get biased perspectives and be told how to vote or not to vote. But the most respected media outets strive to present a full picture and cover all candidates. Still, because most voters will watch or read only portions of news media coverage, the best answer is that media tends to give voters an impression of candidates -- which sometimes is less complete than the full picture.
<span>In the intermediate years that followed the war, Metternich had a policy that he used towards Germany that served to not allow any movement that would lead to the constitutionalism inside the German confederation.</span>
Answer:
How did the constitution guard against Tyranny?
Explanation:
In the first century AD, Jews lived across the Roman Empire in relative harmony. Later along Jews had been banished from Rome in 139 BC, again in 19 AD and during the reign of Claudius.
I tried!!
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
