1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bond [772]
2 years ago
8

Is violence ever justified essay​

English
1 answer:
UNO [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Violence is a central concept for describing social relationships among humans, a concept loaded with ethical and political significance. In some, probably most, circumstances it is evident that violence is unjust; but, some cases appear more debatable to someone’s eyes: can violence ever be justified?

As Self-Defense

The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. If a person punches you in the face and seems intentions to keep doing so, it may seem justified to try and respond to the physical violence.

It is important to notice that violence may come in different forms, including psychological violence and ​verbal violence. In its mildest form, the argument in favor of violence as self-defense claims that to violence of some sort, an equally violent response may be justified. Thus, for instance, to a punch you may be legitimate to respond with a punch; yet, to mobbing (a form of psychological, verbal violence, and institutional), you are not justified in replying with a punch (a form of physical violence).

In a more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense, violence of any kind may be justified in reply to the violence of any other kind, provided there is a somewhat fair use of the violence exercised in self-defense. Thus, it may even be appropriate to respond to mobbing by using physical violence, provided the violence does not exceed that which seems a fair payoff, sufficient to ensure self-defense.

An even more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense has it that the sole possibility that in the future violence will be perpetrated against you, gives you sufficient reason to exercise violence against the possible offender. While this scenario occurs repeatedly in everyday life, it is certainly the more difficult one to justify: How do you know, after all, that an offense would follow?

Violence and Just War

What we have just discussed at the level of individuals can be held also for the relationships between States. A State may be justified to respond violently to a violent attack – be it physical, psychological, or verbal violence to be at stake. Equally, according to some, it may be justifiable to respond with physical violence to some legal or institutional violence. Suppose, for instance, that State S1 imposes an embargo over another State S2 so that inhabitants of the latter will experience tremendous inflation, scarcity of primary goods, and consequent civil depression. While one may argue that S1 did not impart physical violence over S2, it seems that S2 may have some reasons for a physical reaction to S2.

Matters concerning the justification of war have been discussed at length in the history of Western philosophy, and beyond. While some have repeatedly supported a pacifist perspective, other author stressed that on some occasions it is unavoidable to wage wars against some offender.

Idealistic vs. Realistic Ethics

Explanation:

just built diff

You might be interested in
Which statement illustrates a synthesis of ideas?
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

Although the books are set in very different time periods, they both explore the theme of friendship and betrayal.

Explanation:

This above statement mentions opinion.

Rest of the statements are facts.

8 0
3 years ago
As an 11-year-old, my response to losing Clemente was to put together an album of photos clipped from newspaper stories. Since t
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

The author made an album of photos from newspaper stories.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a five-paragraph literary analysis essay, explain how each author develops the common theme. Compare and contrast how the aut
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

Based on the literary analysis paper, it makes the most the close reading work and thus major texts are collaborate.It has been consider with professors and thus able to identify with major components of literacy text and includes subjects from and choice of words.This is totally set with response and have alternate common theme for considering with paragraphs and essays.  

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When structuring an argument, where should the thesis statement be placed?
Greeley [361]
The introductory paragraph, the answer is C
5 0
2 years ago
Help please I’m stuck
mars1129 [50]

I'm assuming its number 2, art beings beauty into people's lives. I could be wrong because I don't have the passage.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Will mark Brainliest!!! Give me a list of 30 Verbs. Be clear please!!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Who is the initial and primary narrator of the novel?
    15·1 answer
  • Whats the possessive noun of ? the hats belong to one elf
    10·1 answer
  • Determine the meaning of the figurative language in this line :" He poured out at his feet a rain of arrows fro mm the quiver"
    15·2 answers
  • What was Macbeth's attitude toward the upcoming fight? (Act V, Sc. 5, Lines 33-52)
    10·1 answer
  • Based on paragraph 1, the reader can infer or predict that the speaker will
    12·1 answer
  • Why do writers go to great lengths to create a specific tone in their writing
    5·2 answers
  • What unusual Characteristic was evident in Bernardo as a child
    7·1 answer
  • Fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies in What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July? Multiple examples please, maybe two.
    9·1 answer
  • Please answer this questions
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!