Gun control is a serious issue throughout the nation. Some people feel that guns should be taken away because they are harmful and cause more negative that positive situations. Guns have killed thousands of people for various reasons, but this is not the guns fault. People are the ones killing and pulling the trigger. Knifes and other weapons kill just as much as guns do but no one notices that. If guns are taken away then people are left defenseless. If someone really wanted a gun after guns were taken away, it is certain they will get one and hurt the people without. Not everyone should have to suffer because a few people use guns not in the way they were intended to be used. Gun control has been a debate for a long time now and everyone has an opinion but no one knows the answer. It's not the guns killing, its the people. Taking away guns is pointless and would do more harm that good.
The sentence needs commas because the participial phrase is essential.
Answer:i know he is a big fat phony and doesn't live in the north pole
Explanation:he never gave me what i wanted on Christmas
Answer:
A
Explanation:
This passage speaks mostly about Banquo's astute understanding of how the agents of evil work: they tell the truth about things that don't matter. Then they betray us in things that really do matter.
Which answer is closest to that interpretation? It certainly isn't B. There is no mention of Banquo's children. Nor of his children becoming kings.
C is possible. But there is no mention of Duncan at all. He says nothing about how Macbeth will go beyond being Thane of Cawdor. Just that there is something beyond the Thane of Cawdor.
D is not in support of murdering Duncan to get the throne. Banquo never was in favor of killing Duncan and he won't be when Macbeth does the grisly deed.
That leaves A. The remark I put at the beginning says just about what Banquo says in the passage.