1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
puteri [66]
3 years ago
5

What was Truman doctrine

History
2 answers:
Natalka [10]3 years ago
4 0
The Truman Doctrine<span> was an American foreign policy whose stated purpose was to counter Soviet geopolitical expansion during the Cold War. It was first announced to Congress by President Harry S. </span>Truman<span>on March 12, 1947 and further developed on July 12, 1948 when he pledged to contain threats to Greece and Turkey.</span>
lbvjy [14]3 years ago
4 0

<u>Answer:</u>

<h3>The Truman Doctrine was a U.S. policy that guaranteed aid to any nation threatened by communism</h3>

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Truman Doctrine was first stated by President Harry Truman to Congress in 1947, saying:  "It must be the policy of the United States to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures."  Essentially, the Truman Doctrine pledged American effort elsewhere in the world to check the spread of communist and Soviet influence.  The policy was first put into action in 1948 by providing economic support to Greece and Turkey to stave off communist movement in those countries.

You might be interested in
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
3 years ago
What song was used in the revolutionary war to make fun of the other side
aleksandr82 [10.1K]
The answer is: : The song used was called the <span>Yankee Doodle. Hope this helps! Good Luck! :)</span>
3 0
3 years ago
(13 Points)
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

B. Desert

Explanation:

Northern Europe is a cold and hilly place, we have plenty of islands and peninsulas.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me.
navik [9.2K]
From early mornings,
when air is still,
we practice and train,
to survive and kill,
we learn our drill while you're on your grill,
organized in 1778,
when war was great,
we had what we did not love,
but showed no hate,
Baron Friedrich von Steuben,
created this for our discipline and organizement, which had no type of excitement,
but here we are still today,
when air is still,
and mornings are displayed
7 0
3 years ago
How did Harry Truman's presidency impact the civil rights of African-Americans during the late 1940's and early 1950's? A) Durin
love history [14]

Answer: C) African-Americans experienced an improved level of civil rights, including the desegregation of the military and the federal government.

The presidency of Harry S Truman saw a lot of improvement to the civil rights of African Americans. The president established the President's Committee on Civil Rights which was tasked with examining the condition of civil rights in the United States.

President Truman, based on their recommendations, signed executive orders 9980 and 9981. These ordered the desegregation of the federal work force and of the armed forces.


5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which policy would the Federal Reserve most likely adopt during a recession?
    6·1 answer
  • help please!!! In your opinion, what are the most significant cultural contributions of African societies? (Do not address Egypt
    6·1 answer
  • Who controlled the majority of the bootlegging business?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement describes how the second Great Awakening promoted social reform movements?
    6·1 answer
  • Help I will make you a brainlist!!
    11·2 answers
  • Los personajes nos provocaban miedo. El miedo no provenía de la forma monstruosa de los personajes, sino de la ambientación mons
    13·1 answer
  • What made the 1857 Scott v. Sanford (Dred Scott) decision so controversial
    7·2 answers
  • How does the consumer dictate what goods and services will be produced?
    12·1 answer
  • Based on what you already know about the american frontier, what obstacles do you think american settlers had to overcome to con
    12·1 answer
  • Which term best describes the battle of gettysburg?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!