Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
Answer:
well what you would have to do is the following go to your profile click the delete the question
Answer:
The remaining part of the question is given below:
(Note that the subsidy can be granted to the education institutions or to the students directly or indirectly; for example, through low- interest student loans.)
a. P2-P0
b. P2-P1
c. P0-P1
d. P1
<u>Correct Answer:</u>
b. P2-P1
Explanation:
A pigouvian subsidy is a subsidy that is used to encourage behaviour that have positive effects on others who are not involved or society at large. <em>Behaviors or actions that are a benefit to others who are not involved in the transaction are called positive externalities.</em>
Answer:
Annuity received is taxable income at Conor's death and must be included in the gross income while filing tax return.
Explanation:
The amount received as an Annuity is taxable and must be included in the gross income while filing the tax returns. This means that the related costs will also be deducted e.g, fees paid, etc. However the return that wasn't received would not be considered as income as Conor didn't received it. Hence the annuity received is treated as taxable income and must be included in the gross income.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
A positive or explanatory statement in the humanities and psychology is about what "is," "was" or "will be," and does not involve any impression of acceptance or rejection.
The positive explanation is supported by empirical evidence. For eg, "A rise in taxes would lead to less usage" and "A decrease in fuel production would cause an increase to its value."
Positive assumptions are commonly used to explain the observable, such as the inflation rate in a country. These are primarily used to explain hypotheses and principles.
