Answer:
1. $3,59,666.66
2. $4,10,066.66
Explanation:
1. The computation of value of firm is shown below:-
As the Earning before interest and tax given remains the same, this impact that there is no growth rate in the earnings to consider.
= Earning before interest and tax × (1 - Tax) ÷ Cost of equity
= $83,000 × (1 - 0.35) ÷ (0.15)
= $53,950 ÷ 0.15
= $3,59,666.66
2. The computation of value of levered firm is shown below:-
Value of unlevered firm + Debt × Tax rate
= 3,59,666.66 + ($144,000 × 35%)
= $4,10,066.66
Answer:
Economic integration agreement is when countries within a particular geographical area decide to remove or relax tariff or non-tariff barriers to trade between themselves and also to coordinate and harmonize their fiscal and economic policies. Free trade area is the simplest form of an economic integration; it is when governments of member countries agree to remove trade restriction between each other and when member countries are given the freedom to determine their own external trade policies towards non-members.
Supporters of free trade area argue that it is beneficial to the country based on the trade creation argument. Trade creation is where high-cost domestic production is replaced by more efficiently produced imports from within the group; that is, more expensive domestic products are replaced by lower priced imports from countries within the group. The trade creation argument is hinged on the fact that a free trade area ensures that trade is generated over and above what would otherwise have happened if there was no integration. Further, the removal of tariffs allows members to specialize in those products for which they have a comparative advantage leading to a variety of cheap imports for domestic consumers, thereby increasing living standards or welfare gains. Trade creation also creates an incentive for high cost domestic producers to cut cost so as to remain competitive thereby enhancing efficiency.
On the other hand, a free trade area is criticized on the basis of trade diversion. This is where trade with a low-cost country outside the group is influenced by higher–cost products supplied from within the group; this results in a less efficient allocation of resources as trade from outside the group is replaced by trade from within the group. Trade diversion could mean that local consumers would have to buy products at less competitive prices. Another argument would be that a free trade area would lead to a removal of tariff between member countries thereby resulting in a cessation of government revenue from tariffs. As opposed to a free trade area, free trade would increase world output and employment, raise quality and lower prices of goods as firms have access to factor inputs; it will also increase world living standards or enhances welfare gains. A free trade agreement only restricts these potential advantages to a particular geographical space.
Explanation:
Answer:
firm can change output levels without having any significant effect on price.
Explanation:
In the case when we say that the firm is a price taker that means the firm has the power to change the level of an output but this does not have any kind of impact on the price. They accepted the price for the prevailing market and each unit could be sold at the similar market price. It could impact the market price also they enjoy the pricing power
Therefore the above statement should be considered
Considering the situation described above, it is concluded that Korea is a <u>High context</u> culture, and the U.S. is a <u>low-context</u> culture.
A high context culture is a type of culture that is characterized by collectivism and an implicit form of communication.
On the other hand, a low context culture is a type of culture that is associated with direct verbal interaction and individualism.
It is no secret that the United States promotes individualism or independence as a society which is a form of low context culture. In contrast, the Korean culture promotes stability and group relation, which is a form of high context culture.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Korea has high context culture while the United States has a low-context culture.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17438233
