Answer: C- Alzania's neighbor exported half its production of cotton that year
Explanation: Alzania produces and consumes 500,000 tons of cotton during a year. While, the neighbor which also employs the same number of people in the cotton industry, consumed 400,000 tons of cotton. There is no information on production of the neighbor. Just by looking at the consumption units we can argue that Alzania has an absolute advantage over the neighbor as it consumes more. However, if there is any information on the amount of exports of cotton from the neighbor then it will weaken the absolute advantage conclusion.
Thus, if <em>Alzania's neighbor exported half its production of cotton that year </em>the total production of cotton is greater of the neighbor than Alzania.
Answer:
$335,428
Explanation:
The computation of the plane operating cost is shown below:
Plane Operating Cost = Fixed cost + (Variable cost per unit × quantity) + (Variable cost per unit × quantity)
= $41,490 + ( $2,839 × 101 flights) + ($23 × 313 passengers)
= $41,490 + $286,739 + $7,199
= $335,428
We only considered the planned activity as we have to compute the plane operating cost for the planning budget
The differences in average income are $6,080, $6169, $18,219, and $19,151.
The table below organizes income from the one with the lowest education level to the highest one. Moreover, there is a general trend in which income increases with education.
Now, to find the difference in average income based on education it is necessary to subtract the income of a lower level to the income of the next educational level.
Less than Highschool vs. High school graduate:
- $31,956 - $25,876 = $6,080
High school graduate vs. some college or Associate's degree:
Some college or Associate's degree vs. Bachelor's degree:
- $56,344 - $38,125 = $18,219
Bachelor's degree vs Profession or Doctorate degree:
- $75,495 - $56,344 = $19,151
Learn more about mathematics in: brainly.com/question/12083755
Answer:
A cost-benefit analysis involves subtracting the sum of all the business costs from the business benefits.
Explanation:
Business is the act of exchanging goods and services for commercial purposes. The main aim of conducting a business for most people is to increase sales and make profit. In order to do this, there are business decisions that go into the running of business that determine how the business will perform. Most of these decisions if taken into account can lead to overall business success. There are different methods in economics that can aid a business person to make a decision, however, in this case we will consider the cost-benefit analysis as a tool of economics that can be used to make business decisions.
As indicated above, a cost-benefit analysis is a method that businesses often use to arrive at decisions. The analysis is done by first assigning monetary units to all the activities and processes that will go into the business. The total costs are then calculated from all the expenditures that will be incurred in the business. The benefits are then calculated from all the revenue expected to be got from the business. The costs are then subtracted from the benefits. The result can be either zero, negative or positive. A zero result implies that the business will break-even, there will be no losses or profits. A negative value implies that the business will go to a loss thus not advisable to venture in it. A positive result shows that the business will be profitable therefor it would be beneficial to venture into it.
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
