Answer:
1) organic organizations are better able to deal with a complex environment.
Explanation:
An organic organization is one that is flexibile, and that can adapt easily, and quickly, to a changing enviroment.
According to the contingency model, organizations are better off when they are flexible, keep their options open, and adapt rapidly to changes. In other words, organic organizations are better able to deal with a complex enviroment.
This is because of the lack of rigidity inside an organic organization. The organic organization will prioritize pragmatism over rules or hierarchy, allowing it to respond more quickly to a dramatic shift, than a mechanistic, rigid organization.
Reviews give you word-of-mouth accounts of how other customers used a product or experienced a service so you can evaluate how it fits with your purchase goals better.
Answer:
The correct option here is B) the degree of liquidity in each element.
Explanation:
Money supply can be described as total amount of money , which is present in an economy at a point of time.
Money supply can be classified as M0,M1,M2 etc , where these different money supply's reflects different type of liquidity that each type of money has in the economy. M0, M1 actually consists of narrow money and contain coins and notes, which are in circulation in the economy and these are easily convertible in to cash and they are most liquid elements and same way M2 would be less liquid than M1, and so on.
Answer:
B. Causes of variability
Explanation:
Inventory reduction via Just in time is a technique that aligns raw material orders from suppliers directly to production schedules. It helps in reducing inventory costs. It increases efficiency and reduces waste as goods are only received when the organization using JIT needs them for operations. In JIT, production period is short, warehouse need is minimize thus reducing costs. Also, it becomes of useful tool in identifying causes of variability. It reduces variability caused by both internal and external factors. Variability are normal deviation from the most efficient and optimum process.
Answer: The nonrefundable $20 ticket is the sunk cost.
Explanation: A sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred and which cannot be recovered.
However, a prospective cost is a future cost that is yet to be incurred and which can be avoided if an action or inaction is taken.
Therefore, from the scenario in the question above, we can see that Susie has already purchased the soccer match ticket which costs $20, and she is yet to incur the costs of gas, wear and tear, and parking fee.
Hence, the $20 is the sunk cost because it has already been incurred and cannot be recovered, while the $10 for gas and wear and tear, and $5 for parking are the prospective costs that will be avoided.
